Cooper Union in NYC must face Jewish students’ lawsuit over pro-Palestinian rally

Cooper Union in NYC must face Jewish students’ lawsuit over pro-Palestinian rally
A federal judge in Manhattan said the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art must face a lawsuit claiming it did nothing to help Jewish students who locked themselves in a library for protection from pro-Palestinian demonstrators. (Reuters/File)
Short Url
Updated 37 sec ago
Follow

Cooper Union in NYC must face Jewish students’ lawsuit over pro-Palestinian rally

Cooper Union in NYC must face Jewish students’ lawsuit over pro-Palestinian rally
  • Many US colleges and universities have faced lawsuits claiming they encouraged or permitted antisemitism after Hamas fighters attacked Israel in October, 2023
  • Jewish students said that at the Oct. 25, 2023 Cooper Union rally, demonstrators stormed past security guards and banged loudly on the library’s doors and windows

NEW YORK: A federal judge in Manhattan said the Cooper Union for the Advancement of Science and Art must face a lawsuit claiming it did nothing to help Jewish students who locked themselves in a library for protection from pro-Palestinian demonstrators.
US District Judge John Cronan ruled on Wednesday that the private college must face claims it violated federal and New York civil rights laws by subjecting Jewish students to “severe and pervasive” antisemitic abuse that did not qualify as constitutionally protected speech.
Cronan, appointed to the bench by President Donald Trump, also said the 10 plaintiffs can seek punitive damages and an injunction to end what they called an antisemitic, anti-Israel campus environment. The judge dismissed some other claims.
Cooper Union and its lawyers did not immediately respond to request for comment. Lawyers for the students had no immediate comment.
Many US colleges and universities have faced lawsuits claiming they encouraged or permitted antisemitism after Hamas fighters attacked Israel in October, 2023, precipitating an Israeli assault on the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip.
Some have settled, including Harvard University last month and New York University last July.
Cronan ruled one week after Trump issued an executive order to push colleges to report possible antisemitic conduct by foreign students, to help authorities “prosecute, remove, or otherwise hold to account” any perpetrators.
Jewish students said that at the Oct. 25, 2023 Cooper Union rally, demonstrators stormed past security guards and banged loudly on the library’s doors and nearly floor-to-ceiling windows, making hateful chants and carrying antisemitic signs.
The students said school administrators did nothing during the 20-minute ordeal, and told law enforcement to back off even as the school’s president left the building through a back door.
They said Cooper Union’s fostering of a hostile educational environment violated Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which bars federal funds recipients from allowing discrimination based on race, religion and national origin.
Some demonstrators told media at the time of the protest they were not targeting individual students, and were not engaged in antisemitism.
Cooper Union argued that the demonstrators engaged in political speech protected by the First Amendment, and there was no proof it was deliberately indifferent to the harassment.
But the judge said he was “dismayed” by Cooper Union’s suggestion that the students could have hidden elsewhere or left, and that it did enough by locking the library doors.
“These events took place in 2023 — not 1943 — and Title VI places responsibility on colleges and universities to protect their Jewish students from harassment,” Cronan wrote.
“The physically threatening or humiliating conduct that the complaint alleges Jewish students in the library experienced is entirely outside the ambit of the free speech clause,” he added.


Trump aides defend his Gaza takeover proposal in face of global condemnation

Trump aides defend his Gaza takeover proposal in face of global condemnation
Updated 4 min 32 sec ago
Follow

Trump aides defend his Gaza takeover proposal in face of global condemnation

Trump aides defend his Gaza takeover proposal in face of global condemnation
  • World leaders said they remained supportive of the two-state solution that has formed the basis of US policy in the region for decades, which has held that Gaza would be part of a future Palestinian state that includes the Israeli-occupied West Bank

WASHINGTON/CAIRO: President Donald Trump’s top aides staunchly defended his proposal for the US to take over war-ruined Gaza and create a “Riviera of the Middle East” after relocating Palestinians elsewhere.
A longtime New York property developer, Trump drew rebukes on Wednesday from world powers Russia, China and Germany, which said it would foster “new suffering and new hatred.” Regional heavyweight Saudi Arabia rejected the proposal outright.
Barely two weeks in the job, Trump shattered decades of US policy on Tuesday with a vaguely worded announcement saying he envisioned building a resort where international communities could live in harmony after nearly 16 months of Israeli bombardment devastated the coastal enclave and killed more than 47,000 people, according to Palestinian tallies.
At a White House briefing on Wednesday, his press secretary Karoline Leavitt hailed his Gaza proposal as “historic” and “outside of the box” thinking but stressed that the president had not made a commitment to putting “boots on the ground” in the Palestinian enclave. She declined, however, to rule out potential use of US troops there.
At the same time, Leavitt backed away from Trump’s earlier assertion that Gazans needed to be permanently resettled in neighboring countries, saying instead that they should be “temporarily relocated” for the rebuilding process.
It was unclear whether Trump would go ahead with his proposal or was simply taking an extreme position as a bargaining strategy, as he has done on other issues in the past.
Trump’s son-in-law and former aide, Jared Kushner, last year described Gaza as “valuable” waterfront property, and on Tuesday Trump made similar claims as he called for the permanent resettlement of more than two million Palestinians from there.
Some experts said the proposed actions could violate international law. Others described his ideas as unworkable.
“Everybody loves it,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office earlier on Wednesday, referring to his Gaza idea.
On a trip to Guatemala, US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, apparently seeking to counter the wave of global criticism, insisted Trump’s proposal was not a “hostile move” but instead expressed “the willingness of the United States to become responsible for the reconstruction of that area.”
Trump offered no specifics as he announced his proposal while welcoming Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to the White House on Tuesday. He said he and his team had been discussing the possibility with Jordan, Egypt and other regional countries.
Netanyahu, who met on Wednesday with US Vice President JD Vance, would not be drawn into discussing the proposal, other than to praise Trump for trying a new approach.
Jordan’s King Abdullah said on Wednesday he rejected any moves to annex land and displace Palestinians. Egypt said it would back Gaza recovery plans, following a ceasefire that took effect on Jan. 19, without Palestinians leaving the territory.

‘TRUMP CAN GO TO HELL’
In Gaza, Palestinians living among the wreckage of their former homes said they would never accept the idea.
“Trump can go to hell, with his ideas, with his money, and with his beliefs. We are going nowhere. We are not some of his assets,” said Samir Abu Basel, a father of five in Gaza City displaced from his house by the war.
Since taking office on Jan. 20, Trump has talked about a US takeover of Greenland, warned of the possible seizure of the Panama Canal and declared that Canada should become the 51st US state.
Some critics have said his expansionist rhetoric echoes old-style imperialism, suggesting it could encourage Russia in its war in Ukraine and give China justification for invading self-ruled Taiwan.
World leaders said they remained supportive of the two-state solution that has formed the basis of US policy in the region for decades, which has held that Gaza would be part of a future Palestinian state that includes the Israeli-occupied West Bank.
US national security adviser Mike Waltz on Wednesday played down any notion the US was walking away from longstanding Middle East policy. “I certainly didn’t hear the president say it was the end of the two-state solution,” he told CBS News.
‘RIDICULOUS AND ABSURD’
An official from Palestinian militant group Hamas, which ruled the Gaza Strip before the war there that followed Hamas’ deadly October 7, 2023, cross-border attack on Israel, said Trump’s proposal was “ridiculous and absurd.”
“Any ideas of this kind are capable of igniting the region,” Sami Abu Zuhri told Reuters, saying Hamas remains committed to the ceasefire accord with Israel and negotiating its next phase.
Trump’s pronouncements appear to run counter to US public opinion, which polls have shown is overwhelmingly opposed to new military entanglements in conflict zones following lengthy interventions in Iraq and Afghanistan.
Trump frequently asserted during the 2024 election campaign and since returning to office that he would end what he called “ridiculous” wars and prevent others from starting.
Trump said that he plans to visit Gaza, Israel and Saudi Arabia, but did not say when he would go.
Trump’s proposal raises questions about whether Saudi Arabia would be willing to join a renewed US-brokered push for a historic normalization of relations with Israel.
Saudi Arabia, a pivotal US ally in the Middle East, said it would not establish ties with Israel without the creation of a Palestinian state, contradicting Trump’s claim that Riyadh was not demanding a Palestinian homeland.
Trump would like Saudi Arabia to follow in the footsteps of the United Arab Emirates, a Middle East trade and business hub, and Bahrain, both of which signed the Abraham Accords in 2020 and normalized ties with Israel.
But on Wednesday, the kingdom’s foreign ministry said Saudi Arabia rejected any attempts to remove Palestinians from their land and said Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman had affirmed this position in “a clear and explicit manner.”
Itamar Ben-Gvir, a far-right Israeli lawmaker and former minister for national security, said “encouraging” Gazans to emigrate was the only correct strategy at the end of the Gaza war and urged Netanyahu to adopt the policy “immediately.”
Michael Milshtein, a former intelligence officer and one of Israel’s leading specialists on Hamas, said Trump’s comments put Israel on a collision course with its Arab neighbors.
“Maybe Trump is trying to promote pressure on the Arab states (so) they will not create any obstacles if he tries to promote a normalization between Saudi Arabia and Israel.”
Gaza residents said after war and bombs had failed to eject them from Gaza that Trump would not succeed in doing so.
As fighting raged in the Gaza war, Palestinians feared they would suffer another “Nakba,” or catastrophe, the time when hundreds of thousands were dispossessed of their homes in the war at the birth of the state of Israel in 1948.
Now they fear another round of displacement.
“We will not leave our areas,” said Um Tamer Jamal, a 65-year-old mother of six. “We have brought our kids up teaching them that they can’t leave their home and they can’t allow a second Nakba.”


Fire kills 17 seminary pupils in Nigeria: officials

Fire kills 17 seminary pupils in Nigeria: officials
Updated 05 February 2025
Follow

Fire kills 17 seminary pupils in Nigeria: officials

Fire kills 17 seminary pupils in Nigeria: officials
  • The fire tore through the hostel of an informal Islamic seminary in the town of Kaura Namoda
  • Aliyu Abubakar Khalifa, the head teacher at the seminary, said around 100 pupils aged between 10 and 16 were sleeping when the fire broke out

KANO: Seventeen pupils at a seminary in northwestern Nigeria died on Wednesday when a fire engulfed their lodging as they slept, police and local authorities said.
The fire tore through the hostel of an informal Islamic seminary in the town of Kaura Namoda in Zamfara state in the middle of the night, killing 17 children and leaving another 17 with severe burns, officials said.
“The cause of the fire is yet to be ascertained, but investigations have commenced to unravel its source,” state police spokesman Yazid Abubakar told AFP.
Aliyu Abubakar Khalifa, the head teacher at the seminary, said around 100 pupils aged between 10 and 16 were sleeping when the fire broke out around midnight, but was initially put out.
“We sent the pupils back to sleep, but around 2:00 am (0100GMT) I heard screams and rushed out to find the lodging on fire and the pupils struggling to escape,” Khalifa said.
Nigerian President Bola Tinubu sent his condolences and “prays for the quick recovery of those receiving medical attention,” his office said in a statement.
Zamfara Governor Lawan Dare’s office said he was “heartbroken” by the tragedy.
Informal madrassa called almajiri schools are common in predominantly Muslim northern Nigeria, where children from poor homes are sent to learn the Qur'an.
The children, who often live in squalor, roam the streets begging for alms between classes.
Attempts by authorities and local groups to reform the age-old madrassa system have not been successful due to opposition from traditional clerics.


Rahim Al-Hussaini is named new spiritual leader of Ismaili Muslims, succeeding his father

Rahim Al-Hussaini is named new spiritual leader of Ismaili Muslims, succeeding his father
Updated 52 min 18 sec ago
Follow

Rahim Al-Hussaini is named new spiritual leader of Ismaili Muslims, succeeding his father

Rahim Al-Hussaini is named new spiritual leader of Ismaili Muslims, succeeding his father
  • Rahim Al-Hussaini was designated as the Aga Khan V
  • The Aga Khan is treated by his followers as a head of state

LISBON: Rahim Al-Hussaini was named Wednesday as the new Aga Khan, spiritual leader of the world’s millions of Ismaili Muslims.
He was designated as the Aga Khan V, the 50th hereditary imam of the Shiite Ismaili Muslims, in his father’s will. His father died Tuesday in Portugal.
The Aga Khan is considered by his followers to be a direct descendant of the Prophet Muhammad and is treated as a head of state.
The Aga Khan Development Network and the Ismaili religious community announced earlier that His Highness Prince Karim Al-Hussaini, the Aga Khan IV and 49th hereditary imam of the Shiite Ismaili Muslims, died surrounded by his family.
It said his burial and will-reading will be held in the coming days, followed by an homage ceremony.
The late Aga Khan was given the title of “His Highness” by Queen Elizabeth in July 1957, two weeks after his grandfather the Aga Khan III unexpectedly made him heir to the family’s 1,300-year dynasty as leader of the Ismaili Muslim sect.
A defender of Islamic culture and values, he was widely regarded as a builder of bridges between Muslim societies and the West despite — or perhaps because of — his reticence to become involved in politics.
The Aga Khan Development Network, his main philanthropic organization, deals mainly with issues of health care, housing, education and rural economic development. It says it works in over 30 countries and has an annual budget of about $1 billion for nonprofit development activities.
Ismailis lived for many generations in Iran, Syria and South Asia before also settling in east Africa, Central Asia and the Middle East, as well as Europe, North America and Australia more recently. They consider it a duty to tithe up to 12.5 percent of their income to the Aga Khan as steward.


A special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders over Ukraine wins backing from European institutions

A special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders over Ukraine wins backing from European institutions
Updated 05 February 2025
Follow

A special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders over Ukraine wins backing from European institutions

A special tribunal to prosecute Russian leaders over Ukraine wins backing from European institutions
  • Legal experts agreed on the framework for the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine
  • “Now, justice is coming,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said

BRUSSELS: A project to establish a court to prosecute the Russian leaders who orchestrated the invasion of Ukraine took a step forward Wednesday, with an announcement from a group of international organizations, including the European Union and the Council of Europe, working together with Ukraine.
Legal experts agreed on the framework for the Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine, which will allow for the prosecution of senior Russian officials for planning and coordinating the full-scale invasion in 2022.
“When Russia chose to roll its tanks over Ukraine’s borders, breaking the UN Charter, it committed one of the gravest violations: the Crime of Aggression. Now, justice is coming,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said in a statement.
The move to create a special tribunal aims to fill a void created by limitations on the International Criminal Court. While The Hague-based court can go after Russian nationals for genocide, war crimes and crimes against humanity, it cannot prosecute Russians for orchestrating the invasion itself.


The 2002 Rome Statute which created the court does include the crime of aggression but only for countries who have joined the court. The Russian Federation is not a member state.
“The accountability gap for the crime of aggression must be closed right now because the lid of Pandora’s Box is blown off completely and our world is plunged into chaos and darkness,” Ukraine’s deputy minister of justice Iryna Mudra told reporters after the announcement was made.
Ukraine has been pushing for the creation of a special tribunal since early in the conflict. “If we want true justice, we should not look for excuses and should not refer to the shortcomings of the current international law but make bold decisions that will correct those shortcomings that unfortunately exist in international law,” Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said during a visit to the Netherlands in 2023.
There are still significant issues to be worked out, including how the tribunal will be paid for and where it will be located. The Netherlands, home to the ICC, the International Court of Justice and other judicial organizations, has offered to host the tribunal.
It is already home to the International Center for Prosecution of the Crime of Aggression, which supports evidence-gathering for a future tribunal and is overseen by the European Union’s judicial cooperation agency, Eurojust. The Council of Europe-backed register of damages, which allows Ukrainian victims of war to catalog the financial harm they have suffered, is also based in the Netherlands.
The tribunal will be established under Ukrainian law, which leaves the future court unable to prosecute the so-called troika, consisting of a country’s head of state, head of government and foreign affairs minister. International law grants that trio immunity while they are in office.
The ICC, which isn’t limited by immunity, has issued an arrest warrant for Russian President Vladimir Putin and several military leaders for war crimes.
The Council of Europe aims to get the tribunal up and running by the end of the year.

 

 


Italy blames badly drafted ICC warrant for Libyan suspect’s release

Italy blames badly drafted ICC warrant for Libyan suspect’s release
Updated 05 February 2025
Follow

Italy blames badly drafted ICC warrant for Libyan suspect’s release

Italy blames badly drafted ICC warrant for Libyan suspect’s release
  • Justice Minister Carlo Nordio told parliament Wednesday that Najim had been arrested on a warrant “that I do not hesitate to define as characterised by inaccuracies “
  • Najim was freed after an appeals court refused to validate his arrest

ROME: Italy’s government shifted blame Wednesday for its much-criticized release of a Libyan war crimes suspect to the International Criminal Court (ICC), which it said had presented a poorly written arrest warrant.
Osama Almasri Najim, the head of Libya’s judicial police, was arrested in the northern Italian city of Turin on January 19 on an ICC warrant, only to be released and flown home to Tripoli two days later on an Italian air force plane.
Opposition parties have denounced the decision to free a man wanted on charges including murder, rape and torture relating to his management of Tripoli’s Mitiga detention center.
Justice Minister Carlo Nordio told parliament Wednesday that Najim had been arrested on a warrant “that I do not hesitate to define as characterised by inaccuracies, omissions, discrepancies and contradictory conclusions.”
Najim was freed after an appeals court refused to validate his arrest.
The justice minister said the court had noted discrepancies concerning dates within the arrest warrant, with crimes attributed to Najim in places dated to February 2011 and others to February 2015.
“An irreconcilable contradiction emerges regarding an essential element of the criminal conduct of the arrested person, regarding the time of the crime committed,” said Nordio, citing “patent, gross and serious contradictions” within the warrant.
The ICC six days later sent a “corrected version” of the arrest warrant, Nordio said, including the dissenting opinion of a judge who had questioned a lack of jurisdiction by the court.
AFP asked for comment from the ICC, but did not immediately receive a response.
Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni revealed last week that she, Nordio and Interior Minister Matteo Piantedosi were under investigation over the case.
A complaint had been made to a Rome prosecutor, who passed it onto the special court that considers cases against ministers.
Elly Schlein, leader of the center-left opposition Democratic Party, said Wednesday that Italy’s “international credibility has been tarnished” by the case.
And she called again for Meloni to come to parliament herself to explain what she said was the government’s “deliberate choice... to free and escort home a Libyan torturer.”
“What kind of country do we want to be, colleagues? On the side of the tortured or on the side of the torturers?” Schlein asked in parliament.
Piantedosi spoke to MPs shortly after Nordio, where he repeated that once Najim had been released from custody, he was deemed too dangerous to remain in Italy.
He denied suggestions that Italy had bowed to pressure from Libya in repatriating Najim.
Some opposition politicians have alleged the suspect was sent home to avoid jeopardizing relations with Libya.
Italy has a controversial agreement dating from 2017 with the UN-backed Libyan government in Tripoli in which Rome provides training and funding to the Libyan coast guard for help deterring the departures of migrants, or returning those already at sea back to Libya.
“I deny in the most categorical manner that... the government received any act or communication that could even remotely be considered a form of undue pressure,” Piantedosi said.