Reconciling the fossil fuel industry with climate goals

Reconciling the fossil fuel industry with climate goals

Photo/Shutterstock
Photo/Shutterstock
Short Url

Responding to the threat of climate change and continuing to produce fossil fuels seem like opposing and irreconcilable poles.

Those who advocate for sustainability are often labeled ideologues, while those who defend the production of fossil fuels are seen as complicit in environmental degradation. However, neither extreme will lead us to success. As we transition to net zero, the world will need to run two energy systems in parallel.

Decarbonization will undoubtedly take time, similar to the time it took to build our dependence on fossil fuels. The key is to ensure a balanced approach that prioritizes sustainability, affordability, and security, all within the context of economic responsibility and fairness for developing nations.

While the adoption of renewable energy sources is rapidly gaining momentum, oil and natural gas still account for 54.8 percent of global energy consumption, according to the 2024 Statistical Review of World Energy.

The oil and gas industry plays a pivotal role, both in providing the energy that drives today’s economy and in enabling energy transition for the future.

I would even go further and say that the technical expertise, required capital, extensive value chain, experience in capital optimization, familiarity with complex operations and markets, and mastery of the technology necessary to achieve the transition to a low-carbon economy can all be found in oil companies.

Keeping oil companies profitable and leveraging their strengths will be crucial to accelerating the energy transition.

While some oil companies aiming for net zero are making strides in certain areas, they are falling short when it comes to developing low-emission fossil fuels, which refers to the extraction, processing and use of oil and gas in ways that minimize environmental impact.

This contrasts with recent advancements in other heavy industries, where innovations like green cement, iron, and steel production are demonstrating the feasibility of reducing emissions, even at a premium. The oil and gas industry needs to catch up.

“There is some value in this ‘green oil’ label. In general it is welcome to have fossil fuels with low or zero production emissions as they represent 12 percent of the total equivalent CO2 emissions,” Andy Brown, Shell’s former upstream director and executive committee member, who also served as CEO of Galp, told me.

Since 2019, companies like BP, Lundin Energy, Occidental Petroleum, Petronas, Eni, Total, and Shell have offered “carbon neutral” oil and liquefied natural gas, some of them with a price premium and reputational gains.

Keeping oil companies profitable and leveraging their strengths will be crucial to accelerating the energy transition.

Rodrigo Tavares

But transparency is key when branding these products as “green oil.” For the term to be accurate, clear regulations defining what constitutes carbon-neutral crude oil are needed. This would include a universal methodology for calculating emissions throughout the industry.

Additionally, certification for carbon neutrality should be consistent, and oil majors would need to address emissions across their products’ entire life cycle.

Most importantly, achieving it could not rely solely on the purchase and retirement of carbon credits to compensate for the calculated lifecycle CO2e emissions of the product. “Offsets have increasingly been discredited as a way to claim abatement,” said Brown. Priority should be given to switching to lower operational greenhouse gas emissions.

Tellingly, just a couple of months ago, staff at the UN-backed Science Based Targets initiative, which certifies whether a company is on track to help limit global warming to under 1.5 C, expressed concern after plans were announced to allow companies to meet their climate targets with carbon offsets.

As we are still far from reaching this scenario, existing carbon crediting organizations like Verra lack the necessary standards for oil companies to generate carbon credits based on emission reductions.

But while “green oil” is difficult to attain, that should not preclude oil companies from pursuing product carbon reductions, aiming at positive impact and economic upsides.

But how can firms maximize returns on investment and minimize emissions per barrel?

Scaling up electrification, especially through renewable electricity, investing in energy efficiency, reducing fugitive methane emissions, venting and routine flaring, and improving geological surveying and digital technologies to decrease the number of dry holes are all viable options.

Carbon capture, utilization, and storage is another avenue. Aramco is currently developing one of the largest CCUS hubs in the world at Jubail Industrial City.

Through the 2023 Oil and Gas Decarbonization Charter, the 2015 “Zero Routine Flaring by 2030” Initiative, and the 2014 Oil and Gas Climate Initiative, oil majors pledge to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions and adopt targets for reducing carbon dioxide and methane emissions. And all leading oil companies have established net zero targets. These are important steps.

The future may see carbon intensity become as important a factor in valuing crude oil as American Petroleum Institute gravity and sulfur content are today, directly impacting its price.

International energy and sustainability organizations should establish clear methodologies, criteria, and standards for oil and gas to be classified as “low carbon” — a more achievable target than “green” or “carbon neutral.”

Only then can a price premium be realistically introduced into market dynamics.

Potential buyers include environmentally conscious refiners, who can leverage low-carbon oil to market cleaner fuels and sustainable products. Airlines and shipping companies, facing increasing pressure to reduce emissions, are also potential customers, as many have adopted ambitious carbon neutrality pledges.

One should note that governments worldwide are implementing mandatory carbon pricing schemes where polluters pay for their emissions, making low-carbon oil even more attractive.

While low carbon oil shows promise, it is just one step. We must prioritize replacing fossil fuels altogether with renewable sources.

Rodrigo Tavares is an invited full professor of sustainable finance at Nova School of Business and Economics, founder and CEO of the Granito Group, and former head of the Office of Foreign Affairs of the Sao Paulo state government.

 

Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers in this section are their own and do not necessarily reflect Arab News' point of view

Trump’s Pentagon lashes out at retired general Milley, yanks security detail

Trump’s Pentagon lashes out at retired general Milley, yanks security detail
Updated 2 min ago
Follow

Trump’s Pentagon lashes out at retired general Milley, yanks security detail

Trump’s Pentagon lashes out at retired general Milley, yanks security detail
  • Milley served as Joint Chiefs chairman under Trump and Biden
  • The retired general has called Trump “fascist to the core“

WASHINGTON: New US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in one of his first acts in the job since being appointed by President Donald Trump, has revoked the personal security detail and security clearance for retired Army general and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley.
Milley, who served as the top US military officer during some of Trump’s first presidential term, became a leading critic of him after retiring as a four-star general in 2023 during former President Joe Biden’s administration and has faced death threats. Milley will also face an inquiry by the Pentagon inspector general’s office into his conduct that could lead to him being bumped down in rank.
Among other criticisms, Milley was quoted as calling Trump “fascist to the core” in the book “War” by journalist Bob Woodward published last year.
The moves to punish Milley, which also include removal of his two portraits in the Pentagon, came as the Pentagon mobilizes to support Trump’s immigration crackdown and to conform to his conservative revamp of policies on personnel.
These include executive orders that aim to ban transgender people from the armed forces, elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and to reinstate thousands of troops who were kicked out of the military for refusing orders to take COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic.
Hegseth’s moves may have a chilling effect on the Pentagon top brass, whose jobs call for them to provide unvarnished military advice even when it runs counter to policies they are tasked to execute.
The Pentagon said the decisions on Milley were meant to underscore the importance of the chain of command. Trump, as president, is commander in chief of the US military.
“Undermining the chain of command is corrosive to our national security, and restoring accountability is a priority for the Defense Department under President Trump’s leadership,” said Hegseth’s chief of staff, Joe Kasper.
Democratic lawmakers slammed the move.
“The administration has placed Milley and his family in grave danger, and they have an obligation to immediately restore his federal protection,” Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in a statement.
Some former government officials are given security detail after retirement because of the threats they may face. Trump has taken away security details of other former officials since taking office, including that of his former national security adviser John Bolton as well as former top diplomat Mike Pompeo.
In the aftermath of Trump’s supporters storming the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in a failed attempt to overturn his 2020 election loss to Biden, Milley called China to reassure Beijing of US stability. Trump, in a social media post, described the phone call as “an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH.”
Some Trump supporters, seeing Milley as disloyal to Trump, had wanted him called back to active duty and tried for treason. Milley received a pardon from Biden on the last day of his presidency on Jan. 20 in a move the outgoing president said was aimed at protecting him and others from political persecution.
Hegseth has said he believes there are too many four-star generals and that nobody is above review.
“We won World War Two with seven four-star generals. Today we have 44 four-star generals,” Hegseth said at his confirmation hearing. “There’s an inverse relationship between the size of staffs and victory on the battlefield.”
Hegseth has also lashed out at Milley in his latest book, including a sentence using an expletive toward him.
Milley’s representatives did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The actions against Milley were first reported by Fox News on Tuesday.
A portrait of Mark Esper, army secretary in Trump’s first administration, was also removed from the Pentagon on Wednesday.
Esper, who was also defense secretary in Trump’s first administration, called him a threat to democracy in the run-up to the 2024 election.
A spokesperson for the US Army Center of Military History said the removed portraits remained Army property and will be stored at the Army Museum Support Center at Fort Belvoir, Virginia.
Milley, as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was Trump’s top military adviser between 2019 and early 2021 and had a dramatic falling out with his boss.
At his retirement ceremony in 2023, Milley took a veiled swipe at Trump, saying US troops take an oath to the Constitution and not a “wannabe dictator.” Trump later that day lashed out at him with a series of insults, calling Milley “slow moving and thinking” and a “moron.” 


Germany’s far-right ‘firewall’ crumbles as migration debate flares

Germany’s far-right ‘firewall’ crumbles as migration debate flares
Updated 4 min 58 sec ago
Follow

Germany’s far-right ‘firewall’ crumbles as migration debate flares

Germany’s far-right ‘firewall’ crumbles as migration debate flares

BERLIN: Weeks before Germany’s elections, a heated immigration debate inflamed by a deadly knife attack triggered a political earthquake Wednesday when conservative parties for the first time cooperated with the far-right AfD.
In what was decried by opponents as a breach of a long-standing taboo, the opposition CDU-CSU relied on backing from the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party to pass a controversial resolution through the national parliament.
Together, and with backing from the smaller FDP, they narrowly passed a toughly-worded motion that harshly attacked the immigration policy of embattled center-left Chancellor Olaf Scholz ahead of February 23 elections.
Though it lacked the force of law, the motion called on the government to permanently police all borders and deny entry to all irregular migrants, whether they claim asylum or not.
Emotions are raw after a knife attack killed two people, including a two-year-old child, in Bavaria last Friday. Police have arrested a 28-year-old Afghan man as the main suspect.
In heated exchanges in the chamber, Scholz had told his election rival, frontrunner Friedrich Merz, that any cooperation with the AfD would be an “unforgivable mistake.”
Scholz told parliament that “since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany over 75 years ago, there has always been a clear consensus among all democrats in our parliaments: we do not make common cause with the far right.”
Merz angrily fired back at Scholz, recalling a series of bloody attacks blamed on asylum seekers and demanded: “What else needs to happen in Germany?“
“How many more children have to become victims of such acts of violence before you also believe there is a threat to public safety and order?“
The AfD’s top candidate, Alice Weidel, cheered the outcome of the vote in a message on X, calling it “a historic day for Germany, a victory for democracy.”
In the vote, conservative and far-right lawmakers, also backed by the liberal Free Democrats (FDP), passed the resolution with 348 votes in favor and 344 against, with 10 abstentions.
Afterwards, Scholz posted on X that he would “need some time to process what we have experienced together today... That is a bad sign. For the parliament. And also for our country.”
The resolution calls for the “rejection of all attempts to enter the country illegally without exception” because in the neighboring EU countries they arrive from, “they are already safe from persecution.”
The resolution also argues that people required to leave Germany “must be taken into custody immediately,” adding that more detention centers should be built.
It labelled as “clearly dysfunctional” the existing EU regulations on asylum seekers.
The motion also criticized the AfD, which it accused of “using the problems, worries and fears caused by mass illegal migration to stir up xenophobia and spread conspiracy theories.”
Despite this clause, the AfD voted in support of the resolution, helping it to pass despite the strong opposition of Scholz’s Social Democrats and the Greens.
Scholz had urged the CDU not to accept support from “those who fight our democracy, who despise our united Europe, and who have been poisoning the climate in our country for years.”
“This is a serious mistake — an unforgivable mistake.”
Merz, despite growing pushback also from human rights groups and churches, had argued the situation is so dire that he would take whatever support he could get.
After the vote, protesters angered at the CDU accepting the AfD’s support demonstrated outside the center-right party’s headquarters in Berlin, waving banners that read: “Stop the hate.”
“My main feeling is anger — I’m very outraged,” Eva, a 56-year-old protester who gave only her first name, told AFP.
The vote came after Germany was stunned by news last Friday that a man attacked a kindergarten group with a kitchen knife in the Bavarian town of Aschaffenburg.
The attacker killed a two-year-old Moroccan boy and a German man who tried to shield the toddlers, and wounded three more people, including a two-year-old Syrian girl.
Police arrested a 28-year-old Afghan suspect, who was later transferred to a closed psychiatric institution.
In December a Saudi man drove a car through a crowded Christmas market in Magdeburg, and there were also deadly stabbing attacks last year blamed on Syrian and Afghan men.


Newly spotted asteroid has a tiny chance of hitting Earth in 2032

Newly spotted asteroid has a tiny chance of hitting Earth in 2032
Updated 14 min 17 sec ago
Follow

Newly spotted asteroid has a tiny chance of hitting Earth in 2032

Newly spotted asteroid has a tiny chance of hitting Earth in 2032

CAPE CANAVERAL, Florida: A newly discovered asteroid has a tiny chance of smacking Earth in 2032, space agency officials said Wednesday.
Scientists put the odds of a strike at slightly more than 1 percent.
“We are not worried at all, because of this 99 percent chance it will miss,” said Paul Chodas, director of NASA’s Center for Near Earth Object Studies. “But it deserves attention.”
First spotted last month by a telescope in Chile, the near-Earth asteroid — designated 2024 YR4 — is estimated to be 130 to 330 feet (40 to 100 meters) across.
Scientists are keeping close watch on the space rock, which is currently heading away from Earth. As the asteroid’s path around the sun becomes better understood, Chodas and others said there’s a good chance the risk to Earth could drop to zero.
The asteroid will gradually fade from view over the next few months, according to NASA and the European Space Agency. Until then, some of the world’s most powerful telescopes will keep monitoring it to better determine its size and path. Once out of sight, it won’t be visible until it passes our way again in 2028.
The asteroid came closest to Earth on Christmas Day — passing within roughly 500,000 miles (800,000 kilometers) of Earth, about twice the distance of the moon. It was discovered two days later.
Chodas said scientists are poring over sky surveys from 2016, when predictions show the asteroid also ventured close.
If scientists can find the space rock in images from then, they should be able to determine whether it will hit or miss the planet, he told The Associated Press. “If we don’t find that detection, the impact probability will just move slowly as we add more observations,” he said.
Earth gets clobbered by an asteroid this size every few thousand years, according to ESA, with the potential for severe damage. That’s why this one now tops ESA’s asteroid risk list.
The potential impact would occur on Dec. 22, 2032. It’s much too soon to know where it might land if it did hit Earth.
The good news, according to NASA, is that for now, no other known large asteroids have an impact probability above 1 percent.


Man City rally to avoid Champions League exit, face Madrid or Bayern next

Man City rally to avoid Champions League exit, face Madrid or Bayern next
Updated 15 min 16 sec ago
Follow

Man City rally to avoid Champions League exit, face Madrid or Bayern next

Man City rally to avoid Champions League exit, face Madrid or Bayern next
MANCHESTER, United Kingdom: Manchester City saved themselves from an embarrassing early Champions League exit with three second-half goals to beat Club Brugge 3-1 on Wednesday.
However, it may be a stay of execution for Pep Guardiola’s men as they will face either Real Madrid or Bayern Munich in the play-off round.
Despite a first defeat in 22 games for Brugge, they also sneaked into the next round in 24th place and will take on Atalanta or Borussia Dortmund next.
The Belgian champions were on course to send City packing before the knockout stages for the first time since 2012 when Raphael Onyedika fired the visitors into the lead just before half-time.
City needed all three points after winning just two of their opening seven matches in the competition’s new format and turned it around just in time.
Mateo Kovacic levelled from the edge of the box before the unfortunate Joel Ordonez turned in Josko Gvardiol’s cross.
Substitute Savinho then drilled in the third to ease the nerves of Pep Guardiola, who anxiously prowled the touchline throughout and was booked for protesting toward the officials.
The drama at the Etihad on a nervous night began before the action even got underway as a merchandise stand caught fire on the perimeter of the stadium shortly before the teams arrived.
Brugge were not daunted by the task that faced them against a diminished version of the English champions and started brightly with Christos Tzolis a constant menace.
City slowly warmed to their task as Ilkay Gundogan slotted home but was flagged offside from Bernardo Silva’s header.
But Brugge remained a persistent threat on the counter-attack and got their reward just before half-time.
Tzolis was again the creator as the Greek’s cross was this time swept home by Onyedika.
Guardiola responded by introducing Savinho for Gundogan at the break in what proved to be an inspired change as City posed far more attacking threat in the second period.
John Stones headed wide a glorious chance to equalize just seconds after the restart.
Kovacic then provided much-needed drive from the City midfield as the Croatian powered forward and slotted in from the edge of the box to level on 53 minutes.
But in the nine minutes between City’s first and second goals, Brugge could have sent the 2023 champions to an early exit.
Tzolis fired too close to Ederson, drilled a shot inches wide and was prevented another clear sight of goal by Gvardiol’s last-ditch intervention with a hat-trick of big chances.
At the other end, it was Brugge who did the hard work for City as Gvardiol’s low cross was turned into his own net by Ordonez.
Guardiola furiously kicked a water box during his celebration.
The City boss’ mood was not helped when Erling Haaland wasted his one huge chance of the evening as Simon Mignolet saved a one-on-one and Savinho’s follow-up effort was cleared off the line by Brandon Mechele.
But Guardiola was finally able to offer a smile of relief 13 minutes from time when Savinho took down Stones’ cross on his chest and blasted in his first Champions League goal.
Guardiola even embraced his counterpart Nicky Hayen before the match finished as the two exchanged a handshake during stoppage time.
But the City manager will be under no illusions that his side will need to be much better if they are to have aspirations of conquering Europe again in the coming months.

Syria’s Sharaa: jihadist to interim head of state

Syria’s Sharaa: jihadist to interim head of state
Updated 23 min 8 sec ago
Follow

Syria’s Sharaa: jihadist to interim head of state

Syria’s Sharaa: jihadist to interim head of state

DAMASCUS: In less than two months, Syria’s Ahmed Al-Sharaa has risen from rebel leader to interim president, after his Islamist group led a lightning offensive that toppled Bashar Assad.
Sharaa was appointed Wednesday to lead Syria for an unspecified transitional period, and has been tasked with forming an interim legislature after the dissolution of the Assad era parliament and the suspension of the 2012 constitution.
The former jihadist has abandoned his nom de guerre Abu Mohammed Al-Jolani, trimmed his beard and donned a suit and tie to receive foreign dignitaries since ousting Assad from power on December 8.
The tall, sharp-eyed Sharaa has held a succession of interviews with foreign journalists, presenting himself as a patriot who wants to rebuild and reunite Syria, devastated and divided after almost 14 years of civil war.
Syria’s new authorities also announced Wednesday the dissolution of armed factions, including Sharaa’s own Hayat Tahrir Al-Sham (HTS), which is rooted in the Syrian branch of Al-Qaeda.
Since breaking ties with Al-Qaeda in 2016, Sharaa has sought to portray himself as a more moderate leader, and HTS has toned down its rhetoric, vowing to protect Syria’s religious and ethnic minorities.
But Sharaa has yet to calm misgivings among some analysts and Western governments that still class HTS as a terrorist organization.
“He is a pragmatic radical,” Thomas Pierret, a specialist in political Islam, told AFP.
“In 2014, he was at the height of his radicalism,” Pierret said, referring to the period of the war when he sought to compete with the jihadist Daesh group.
“Since then, he has moderated his rhetoric.”
Born in 1982 in Saudi Arabia, Sharaa is from a well-to-do Syrian family and was raised in Mazzeh, an upscale district of Damascus.
In 2021, he told US broadcaster PBS that his nom de guerre was a reference to his family’s roots in the Golan Heights. He said his grandfather was among those forced to flee the territory after its capture by Israel in 1967.
According to the Middle East Eye news website, it was after the September 11, 2001 attacks that he was first drawn to jihadist thinking.
“It was as a result of this admiration for the 9/11 attackers that the first signs of jihadism began to surface in Jolani’s life, as he began attending secretive sermons and panel discussions in marginalized suburbs of Damascus,” the website said.
Following the US-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, he left Syria to take part in the fight.
He joined Al-Qaeda in Iraq, led by Abu Musab Al-Zarqawi, and was subsequently detained for five years, preventing him from rising through the ranks of the jihadist organization.
In March 2011, when the revolt against Assad’s rule erupted in Syria, he returned home and founded Al-Nusra Front, Syria’s branch of Al-Qaeda.
In 2013, he refused to swear allegiance to Abu Bakr Al-Baghdadi, who would go on to become the emir of the Daesh group, and instead pledged his loyalty to Al-Qaeda’s Ayman Al-Zawahiri.
A realist in his partisans’ eyes, an opportunist to his adversaries, Sharaa said in May 2015 that he, unlike Daesh, had no intention of launching attacks against the West.
He also proclaimed that should Assad be defeated, there would be no revenge attacks against the Alawite minority that the president’s clan stems from.
He cut ties with Al-Qaeda, claiming to do so in order to deprive the West of reasons to attack his organization.
According to Pierret, he has since sought to chart a path toward becoming a credible statesman.
In January 2017, Sharaa imposed a merger with HTS on rival Islamist groups in northwestern Syria, thereby taking control of swathes of Idlib province that had been cleared of government troops.
In areas under its grip, HTS developed a civil administration and established a semblance of a state in Idlib province, while crushing its rebel rivals.
Throughout this process, HTS faced accusations from residents and human rights groups of brutal abuses against those who dared dissent, which the United Nations has classed as war crimes.