Presidents have used autopens for decades. Now Trump objects to Biden’s use of one

Damilic Corp. president Bob Olding anchors a sheet of paper as the Atlantic Plus, the Signascript tabletop model autopen, produces a signature at their Rockville, Md., office, June 13, 2011. (AP)
Damilic Corp. president Bob Olding anchors a sheet of paper as the Atlantic Plus, the Signascript tabletop model autopen, produces a signature at their Rockville, Md., office, June 13, 2011. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 18 March 2025
Follow

Presidents have used autopens for decades. Now Trump objects to Biden’s use of one

Presidents have used autopens for decades. Now Trump objects to Biden’s use of one
  • An autopen is a mechanical device that is used to replicate a person’s authentic signature

WASHINGTON: President Donald Trump claimed Monday that pardons recently issued by Joe Biden to lawmakers and staff on the congressional committee that investigated the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot have no force because, Trump says, the-then president signed them with an autopen instead of by his own hand.
“In other words, Joe Biden did not sign them but, more importantly, he did not know anything about them!” Trump wrote on his social media site. Trump didn’t offer any evidence to support his claims. Nor did the White House.
Trump asserted in his all-caps post that the pardons are void and have no effect in his estimation. But presidents have broad authority to pardon or commute the sentences of whomever they please, the Constitution doesn’t specify that pardons must be in writing and autopen signatures have been used before for substantive actions by presidents.




President Donald Trump signs an executive order in the Oval Office of the White House, Monday, Feb. 3, 2025, in Washington. (AP)

A representative for Biden declined comment.
WHAT IS AN AUTOPEN?
An autopen is a mechanical device that is used to replicate a person’s authentic signature. A pen or other writing implement is held by an arm of the machine, which reproduces a signature after a writing sample has been fed to it. Presidents, including Trump, have used them for decades. Autopens aren’t the same as an old-fashioned ink pad and rubber stamp or the electronic signatures used on PDF documents.
WHY IS IT SUDDENLY AN ISSUE?
The Oversight Project at the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank recently said its analysis of thousands of pages of documents bearing Biden’s signature found that most were by autopen, including pardons. Conservative media have amplified the claims, which have been picked up by Trump. He has commented for several days running about Biden’s autopen use.
Mike Howell, the project’s executive director, said in an interview that his team is scrutinizing Biden’s pardons because that power lies only with the president under the Constitution and can’t be delegated to another person or a machine. Howell said some of Biden’s pardon papers also specify they were signed in Washington on days when he was elsewhere.
WHAT DOES THE LAW SAY?
There is no law governing a president’s use of an autopen.
A 2005 opinion from the Office of Legal Counsel at the Justice Department said an autopen can be used to sign legislation. Barack Obama became the first president to do so in May 2011 when he signed an extension of the Patriot Act. Obama was in France on official business and, with time running out before the law expired, he authorized use of the autopen to sign it into law.




US President Joe Biden signs into law the Ukraine Democracy Defense Lend-Lease Act of 2022, in the Oval Office of the White House in Washington, DC, on May 9, 2022. (AFP)

Much earlier guidance on pardons was sent in 1929 from the solicitor general — the attorney who argues for the United States before the Supreme Court — to the attorney general. It says “neither the Constitution nor any statute prescribes the method by which executive clemency shall be exercised or evidenced.”
HAS TRUMP USED AN AUTOPEN?
Yes, but “only for very unimportant papers,” he said on Monday.
He told reporters aboard Air Force One on Sunday night that, “we may use it, as an example, to send some young person a letter because it’s nice. You know, we get thousands and thousands of letters, letters of support for young people, from people that aren’t feeling well, etcetera. But to sign pardons and all of the things that he signed with an autopen is disgraceful.”
WHY IS HE SINGLING OUT THE JAN. 6 PARDONS?
Trump remains angry at being prosecuted by the Justice Department over his actions in inspiring his supporters to go to the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in an attempt to stop lawmakers from certifying Biden’s defeat of him in the 2020 election, though the case was dismissed after he won reelection. At the end of his term, Biden issued “preemptive pardons” to lawmakers and committee staff to protect them from any possible retribution from Trump.
On whether pardons must be in writing or by the president’s own hand, the US Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit has said the ”plain language of the Constitution imposes no such limitation.” Biden’s statement accompanying those pardons make clear they were official acts, said Carl Tobias, professor at the University of Richmond law school.
Biden issued hundreds of commutations or pardons, including to members of his family, also because he feared possible prosecution by Trump and his allies.
Trump vigorously used such powers at the opening of his presidency, issuing one document — a proclamation — granting pardons and commutations to all 1,500-plus people charged in the insurrection at the Capitol.
HOW ELSE DO PRESIDENTS USE THE AUTOPEN?
Presidents also use an autopen to sign routine correspondence to constituents, like letters recognizing life milestones.
During the Gerald Ford administration, the president and first lady Betty Ford occasionally signed documents and other correspondence by hand but White House staff more often used autopen machines to reproduce their signatures on letters and photographs.

 


Trump administration reinstating 24,500 fired workers after court order

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Trump administration reinstating 24,500 fired workers after court order

Trump administration reinstating 24,500 fired workers after court order
The mass firings, part of President Donald Trump’s broader purge of the federal workforce, were widely reported
The court filings are the first full accounting of the terminations by the administration

WASHINGTON: The Trump administration in court filings has for the first time acknowledged that it fired nearly 25,000 recently hired workers, and said agencies were working to bring all of them back after a judge ruled that their terminations were likely illegal.
The filings made in Baltimore, Maryland, federal court late Monday include statements from officials at 18 agencies, all of whom said the reinstated probationary workers were being placed on administrative leave at least temporarily.
The mass firings, part of President Donald Trump’s broader purge of the federal workforce, were widely reported, but the court filings are the first full accounting of the terminations by the administration.
Most of the agencies said they had fired a few hundred workers. The Treasury Department terminated about 7,600 people, the Department of Agriculture about 5,700 and the Department of Health and Human Services more than 3,200, according to the filings.
US District Judge James Bredar on March 13 said the mass firings of probationary workers that began last month violated regulations governing the mass layoffs of federal employees, and ordered them to be reinstated pending further litigation.
Probationary workers typically have less than one year of service in their current roles, though some are longtime federal employees.
Bredar’s ruling came in a lawsuit by 19 Democrat-led states and Washington, D.C., who said the mass firings would trigger a spike in unemployment claims and greater demand for social services provided by states.
The office of Maryland Attorney General Anthony Brown, which is spearheading the lawsuit, did not immediately respond to a request for comment on Tuesday.
The Trump administration has appealed Bredar’s decision and on Monday asked a Richmond, Virginia-based appeals court to pause the ruling pending the outcome of the case.
Hours before Bredar issued his ruling, a federal judge in San Francisco had ordered that probationary workers be reinstated at six agencies, including five also covered by Bredar’s order and the US Department of Defense. The administration has also appealed that decision.
In the filings late Monday, agency officials said they had either reinstated all of the fired employees or were working to do so, but warned that bringing back large numbers of workers had imposed significant burdens and caused confusion and turmoil.
The officials also noted that an appeals court ruling reversing Bredar’s order would allow agencies to again fire the workers, subjecting them to multiple changes in their employment status in a matter of weeks.
“The tremendous uncertainty associated with this confusion and these administrative burdens impede supervisors from appropriately managing their workforce,” Mark Green, deputy assistant secretary at the US Department of the Interior, wrote in one of the filings. “Work schedules and assignments are effectively being tied to hearing and briefing schedules set by the courts.”
Bredar has scheduled a hearing for March 26 on whether to keep his ruling in place pending the outcome of the lawsuit, which could take months or longer to resolve.

At least 18 killed in airstrike on market in northern Mali, separatist group says

At least 18 killed in airstrike on market in northern Mali, separatist group says
Updated 32 min 15 sec ago
Follow

At least 18 killed in airstrike on market in northern Mali, separatist group says

At least 18 killed in airstrike on market in northern Mali, separatist group says
  • The army said it had mounted an attack targeting armed militants.
  • Mali, along with its neighbors Burkina Faso and Niger, has for more than a decade battled an insurgency fought by armed groups

BAMAKO: At least 18 people have been killed in an airstrike in northern Mali, a separatist group said. The army said it had mounted an attack targeting armed militants.
The Collective for the Defense of the Rights of the Azawad People, which is part of a Tuareg separatist coalition, said Monday the Malian army bombed a market 50 km (30 miles) north of Lerneb, in the Timbuktu region.
Seven people were also injured in the strike on Sunday, the group said in a statement, denouncing a “barbaric act from another age” and a “flagrant human rights violation.”
Mali’s army said Monday in a statement on X it carried out air strikes on a “refuge” in the same area cited by the separatist group, killing 11 “terrorists.”
Mali, along with its neighbors Burkina Faso and Niger, has for more than a decade battled an insurgency fought by armed groups, including some allied with Al-Qaeda and the Daesh group.
Following military coups in all three nations in recent years, the ruling juntas have expelled French forces and turned to Russian mercenary units for security assistance instead.
Since seizing power in 2021, Col. Assimi Goita has struggled to curb violence in central and northern Mali, while the army has been accused of targeting civilians.
Last month, the Front for the Liberation of Azawad, the coalition of Tuareg separatist groups, accused the Malian army and Russian mercenaries from the Wagner group of “coldly executing” at least 24 people in northern Mali.
Last year, the rights group Human Rights Watch said in a report the army and Russian mercenaries killed at least 32 civilians, including seven in a drone strike, kidnapped four others, and burned at least 100 homes in towns and villages in central and northern Mali between May and December.


Australia slams reported targeting of citizen by Hong Kong

Australia slams reported targeting of citizen by Hong Kong
Updated 56 min 20 sec ago
Follow

Australia slams reported targeting of citizen by Hong Kong

Australia slams reported targeting of citizen by Hong Kong
  • The letters offered a reward of $128,000 to anyone who could provide information about him
  • “The Australian government will not tolerate surveillance, harassment or intimidation against individuals or family members here in Australia,” said a spokesperson

SYDNEY: Australia voiced unease on Tuesday over anonymous letters reportedly offering hefty rewards for information on a Hong Kong activist now living in Melbourne.
Australian citizen Kevin Yam, a lawyer and longtime Hong Kong pro-democracy activist, was targeted in letters that carried his photo and alleged national security offenses.
The letters, first reported in The Guardian newspaper, offered a reward of HK$1 million ($128,000) to anyone who could provide information about him and the allegations or “take him to Hong Kong or Australia Metropolitan Police.”
They were sent to homes next to two Melbourne locations cited in the notices as being linked to Yam, the paper said.
“The Australian government will not tolerate surveillance, harassment or intimidation against individuals or family members here in Australia — this undermines our national sovereignty and the security and safety of Australians,” said a spokesperson for Foreign Minister Penny Wong.
“We are raising our concerns directly with Chinese and Hong Kong authorities.”
In a message on social media, Yam said he would continue to live his “everyday life.”
“I will not voluntarily return to Hong Kong before it is free,” he said.
“I will not kill myself.”
Beijing expressed “strong dissatisfaction and resolute opposition” to what it called “Australia’s blatant interference” in Hong Kong’s law.
“Hong Kong affairs are purely a Chinese internal affair and brook no interference from any outside powers,” foreign ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told a regular briefing, when asked about the case concerning Yam.
“China urges Australia to earnestly respect China’s sovereignty... and create favorable conditions and atmosphere for the sustainable development of China-Australia relations,” she added.
The letters were not signed but asked for information to be sent to a Hong Kong police email address used for tip-offs on wanted people.
The Hong Kong government said it does not issue anonymous letters.
Recipients should “remain cautious to verify the authenticity” of any such letters and seek help from local police if needed, a government spokesman told AFP.
Hong Kong law enforcement will pursue overseas suspects in accordance with the law and “take every measure” to stop them from continuing to endanger national security, the spokesman added.
Yam reportedly returned to Australia in 2022 after two decades in Hong Kong.
In 2023, Hong Kong chief executive John Lee called on eight overseas activists including Yam to turn themselves in for violating the national security law.
At the time, he backed a police decision to offer HK$1 million for information leading to their arrests, and warned the activists to surrender or “spend their days in fear.”
All eight fled Hong Kong after Beijing imposed a sweeping national security law on the financial hub in 2020 to quell dissent after huge, sometimes violent, pro-democracy protests in 2019 were quashed.


At Delhi’s iconic Jama Masjid, Hindu woman joins Muslims to serve iftar

Indian Muslims gather for iftar at the Jama Masjid complex in Old Delhi on March 16, 2025. (AN photo)
Indian Muslims gather for iftar at the Jama Masjid complex in Old Delhi on March 16, 2025. (AN photo)
Updated 18 March 2025
Follow

At Delhi’s iconic Jama Masjid, Hindu woman joins Muslims to serve iftar

Indian Muslims gather for iftar at the Jama Masjid complex in Old Delhi on March 16, 2025. (AN photo)
  • Third year for Neha Bharati to serve iftar at the iconic Delhi mosque
  • She has been encouraged, supported by her Hindu family members

NEW DELHI: Every afternoon during Ramadan, Neha Bharati makes sure to arrive at the Jama Masjid complex around Maghrib prayer time to bring snacks for her Muslim neighbors and others gathered to break their fast in Old Delhi.

This is the third year that Bharati, a 27-year-old Hindu woman living in the historic heart of India’s capital, has been serving iftar at the iconic 17th-century mosque built by Mughal emperor Shahjahan.

She has been encouraged by her parents who saw the need to act amid what they observed as growing religious tensions since India’s Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party took power in 2014.

“I felt some change needed to be brought about. Then my parents and family suggested that we start ... We would start serving iftar at the main Jama Masjid,” Bharati told Arab News, as she prepared to distribute hundreds of savory pastry snacks among the people coming out of the mosque.

“I wanted this message to reach the people that interfaith harmony is still alive ... There are many people who have become symbols of Hindu-Muslim unity. They are doing good work.”

Bharati is supported in her efforts by both Muslims and Hindus.

“No one is isolated, our blood is the same. We are all working together unitedly. And I am working with this spirit,” she said.

“Some Hindus also donate and ask me to serve iftar at Jama Masjid ... When we all break the fast together. It really feels nice. I want this camaraderie to be alive, that’s why we come here.”

Ramsha Noor, a homemaker, has been helping Bharati in iftar preparations since the very beginning and has observed a growing community involvement.

“This is also a message for girls to come out of homes, help people,” she said.

“Many people feel the change. Now we have a team of five girls. Earlier we were only two.”

India’s Muslim community is the world’s third largest, constituting about 15 percent of its 1.5 billion population.

Anas Ahmad, who has been joining Bharati since she started organizing iftars, said it felt special to break the fast with her and her friends.

“We come here to meet her from far away and I also help her sometimes,” he said.

“When we go to her to take the iftar we get a different kind of feeling. She is doing great work of strengthening brotherhood.”

Mohammad Afroz and Zaid Qureshi, who also broke their fast at Jama Masjid, were full of appreciation for Bharati’s presence and contribution.

“She is spreading love and promoting Hindu-Muslim unity ... this is a great thing,” Qureshi said.

“She will be blessed,” Afroz added. “We should learn from this ... This helps in honing brotherhood and harmony. This helps in spreading camaraderie and love.”


MI6 has never had a woman as spy chief. That could be about to change

MI6 has never had a woman as spy chief. That could be about to change
Updated 18 March 2025
Follow

MI6 has never had a woman as spy chief. That could be about to change

MI6 has never had a woman as spy chief. That could be about to change
  • Britain’s foreign intelligence agency launched a search for its next chief on Tuesday
  • The current officeholder has suggested he’d like his replacement to be a woman

LONDON: Real-life spies say their world is nothing like that of James Bond, but in one way truth may soon follow fiction: MI6 could be about to get its first woman leader.
Britain’s foreign intelligence agency launched a search for its next chief on Tuesday, and the current officeholder has suggested he’d like his replacement to be a woman. Although Judi Dench played M, the fictional head of MI6, in seven Bond thrillers starting in the 1990s, the real-life agency has not had a woman chief in its 116-year history.
Richard Moore, the current C — as the real-life MI6 chief is known — wrote on X in 2023 that he would “help forge women’s equality by working to ensure I’m the last C selected from an all-male shortlist.”
Britain’s two other main intelligence agencies have already shattered the spy world’s glass ceiling. MI5, the domestic security service, was led by Stella Rimington from 1992 to 1996 and Eliza Manningham-Buller between 2002 and 2007. Anne Keast-Butler became head of electronic and cyber-intelligence agency GCHQ in 2023.
Moore, an Oxford-educated former diplomat, fits the 007 mold like a Savile Row suit. But in recent years MI6 has worked to shed its image as the least diverse of the agencies, broadening its recruitment process from the traditional “tap on the shoulder” at an elite university.
The agency’s website stresses its family-friendly flexible working policy and goal of recruiting “talented people from all backgrounds.”
In 2021, Moore apologized on behalf of MI6 for its treatment of LGBT staff and aspiring agents who were fired or denied jobs because of their sexuality. Gay people were barred from working for the agency until 1991.
Moore said in a 2023 speech that he wanted MI6 to “better represent the country we serve.”
“Diversity brings greater creativity, better problem-solving,” he said.
In posts on X last week to mark International Women’s Day, Moore said: “No one gets a job in MI6 except on merit. But we men, as allies, can help our female colleagues achieve the success their talent deserves. We have yet to have a woman as Chief so there’s still a glass ceiling to shatter.”
Moore, appointed in 2020, has led MI6 through the COVID pandemic, Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the Israel-Hamas war. He has opened the secretive agency ever-so-slightly to media scrutiny, making public speeches and embracing social media.
Like many things about MI6, also known as the Secret Intelligence Service, the process of choosing Moore’s replacement takes place out of public view. It began with the country’s top civil servant, Cabinet Secretary Chris Wormald, writing to government departments on Tuesday asking them to put forward candidates.
Applicants may come from among three MI6 directors-general who report to Moore, all of whom are women. That includes the agency’s head of operations and its technology chief – the real-life equivalent of Bond gadget-master Q.
Applicants also could come from other intelligence agencies, the civil service, the diplomatic service, the armed forces or the police.
An announcement of the choice is likely in the summer, with the new chief taking up their post in the fall.