France’s Marine Le Pen ‘will never forgive’ herself for expelling father

French far-right leader Marine Le Pen accompanies the hearse transporting the coffin that contain the remains of her father, former far-right National Front party leader Jean-Marie Le Pen, in Trinite-sur-Mer, western France, Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025. (AP)
French far-right leader Marine Le Pen accompanies the hearse transporting the coffin that contain the remains of her father, former far-right National Front party leader Jean-Marie Le Pen, in Trinite-sur-Mer, western France, Saturday, Jan. 11, 2025. (AP)
Short Url
Updated 14 January 2025
Follow

France’s Marine Le Pen ‘will never forgive’ herself for expelling father

France’s Marine Le Pen ‘will never forgive’ herself for expelling father
  • Jean-Marie Le Pen declared in 1987 that the Nazi gas chambers used to exterminate Jews are “just a detail in the history of World War II”

PARIS: French far-right leader Marine Le Pen said she will never forgive herself for expelling her father Jean-Marie Le Pen from her party, after he died last week aged 96.
Nicknamed “the devil of the Republic” by opponents, Jean-Marie Le Pen was often openly racist, made no secret of anti-Semitic views, for which he received criminal convictions, and boasted of torturing prisoners during the war against Algeria.
Marine Le Pen took over as head of the National Front (FN) in 2011 but rapidly took steps toward making the party an electable force, renaming it the National Rally (RN) and embarking on a policy known as dediabolization (de-demonization).
She slung her father out of the party for his anti-Semitic views in 2015. But the pair had reconciled in recent years.
“I will never forgive myself for this decision, because I know it caused him immense pain,” he told the Journal du dimanche (JDD) newspaper in an interview published on its website late Sunday.
“This decision was one of the most difficult of my life. And until the end of my life, I will always ask myself the question: ‘could I have done this differently?’,” she said.
Jean-Marie Le Pen declared in 1987 that the Nazi gas chambers used to exterminate Jews are “just a detail in the history of World War II.”
In 2014, he said of Patrick Bruel, a Jewish singer critical of Le Pen, that he would be part of “a batch we will get next time.”
Addressing such remarks, Marine Le Pen said: “It’s somewhat unfair to judge him solely on the basis of these controversies.”
After his long political career, “it is inevitable to have subjects that arouse controversy,” she argued, while saying it was “unfortunate” that Jean-Marie Le Pen “got bogged down in these provocations.”

The interview marked a rare insight from Marine Le Pen into her relationship with her father, who was buried on Saturday in a quiet family ceremony in his home region of Brittany in western France.
Marine Le Pen, who stood three times for the Elysee and is likely preparing another run in 2027, is extremely discreet about her private and family life.
News magazine Paris Match posted a picture of Marine Le Pen in tears on being informed of the news of her father’s death, but deleted the image following protests from the RN.
Jean-Marie Le Pen’s death was announced to AFP on Tuesday in a statement signed “Le Pen Family.”
But Marine Le Pen, who was on a plane taking her back from the cyclone-ravaged French island of Mayotte to mainland France, only learned of the news afterwards, during a stopover in Nairobi.
Some French media have interpreted this as a sign of conflict within her family and with her two sisters Marie-Caroline and Yann.
“At the time, I didn’t believe it (his death). Then... knowing that he was in very fragile health, I called my sister to find out what was going on. And she was the one who told me,” she said.
 

 


Ukraine’s parliament extends martial law until August

Updated 4 sec ago
Follow

Ukraine’s parliament extends martial law until August

Ukraine’s parliament extends martial law until August
  • Extension delays timing of new elections
  • Also allows Ukraine to continue mobilizing troops
KYIV: Ukraine’s parliament has extended martial law until August, lawmakers said, delaying the timing of new elections that the United States and Russia have been pushing for. As the war with Russia rages on, an overwhelming majority of 357 deputies on Wednesday supported the extension. It allows the country to continue mobilizing troops and suspends the election cycle. President Volodymyr Zelensky has faced pressure to hold elections from US President Donald Trump, who called him a dictator — criticism that prompted Ukrainians to rally around Zelensky and boosted his approval ratings. Russian President Vladimir Putin has repeatedly questioned Zelensky’s legitimacy after his term ended in 2024. But in line with the Ukrainian legislation, elections are impossible during martial law. As peace talks led by the Trump administration created hopes for a potential ceasefire and eventual elections, some Ukrainian opposition politicians started criticizing Zelensky more openly. Petro Poroshenko, a former president and leader of the largest opposition party, “European Solidarity,” said there was no doubt martial law should be extended, especially after deadly Russian strikes on Sumy and Kryvyi Rih this month. But he accused Zelensky of attempting to strengthen his powers during martial law. “I want to stress that we should recognize the obvious — the government has started to abuse martial law, using it not only to defend the country, but to build an authoritarian regime,” Poroshenko said during parliamentary debates on Tuesday. However Poroshenko’s party overwhelmingly supported the extension of martial law, with only one lawmaker from the party voting against it.

Al-Shabab attacks strategic Somalia town as it presses offensive

Al-Shabab attacks strategic Somalia town as it presses offensive
Updated 1 min ago
Follow

Al-Shabab attacks strategic Somalia town as it presses offensive

Al-Shabab attacks strategic Somalia town as it presses offensive
  • Advances by the Al-Qaeda affiliate have left residents of the capital on edge amid rumors Al-Shabab could target the city
  • Al-Shabab, which has waged an insurgency since 2007, said that its forces had overrun 10 military installations and captured the town
MOGADISHU: Al-Shabab fighters attacked a town in central Somalia on Wednesday that government forces have been using as a staging area for their efforts to drive back the militants, who have been gaining ground in recent weeks, residents said.
Advances by the Al-Qaeda affiliate, which included briefly capturing villages within 50 km (30 miles) of Mogadishu last month, have left residents of the capital on edge amid rumors Al-Shabab could target the city.
The army has recaptured those villages, but Al-Shabab has continued to advance in the countryside, leading the government to deploy police officers and prison guards to support the military, soldiers have told Reuters.
The town attacked on Wednesday, Adan Yabaal, lies around 245 kilometers north of Mogadishu and has been used as an operating base for raids on Al-Shabab.
President Hassan Sheikh Mohamud, who hails from the area, visited Adan Yabaal last month to meet with military commanders there about reinforcing them.
“After early morning prayers, we heard a deafening explosion, then gunfire,” Fatuma Nur, a mother of four, told Reuters by telephone from Adan Yabaal. “Al-Shabab attacked us from two directions. I am indoors and fighting is still going on.”
The outcome of the battle was not immediately clear, with government forces and Al-Shabab giving conflicting accounts.
Captain Hussein Olow, a military officer in Adan Yabaal, told Reuters that government troops had pushed back the militants.
Al-Shabab, which has waged an insurgency since 2007 to seize power and rule based on its strict interpretation of Islamic Sharia law, said in a statement that its forces had overrun 10 military installations and captured the town.
National government officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The fighting comes as the future of international security support to Somalia has grown increasingly precarious.
A new African Union peacekeeping mission replaced a larger force at the start of the year, but its funding is uncertain, with the United States opposed to a plan to transition to a UN financing model.

Earthquake strikes under Indian Ocean far off Australian coast, but no tsunami warning issued

Earthquake strikes under Indian Ocean far off Australian coast, but no tsunami warning issued
Updated 2 min 48 sec ago
Follow

Earthquake strikes under Indian Ocean far off Australian coast, but no tsunami warning issued

Earthquake strikes under Indian Ocean far off Australian coast, but no tsunami warning issued

Melbourne: A 6.6-magnitude earthquake struck far off southwest Australia on Wednesday, but no tsunami warning was issued.

The epicenter was in the Indian Ocean 2,069 kilometers (1,283 miles) southwest of Albany on the southwest tip of Western Australia state at a depth of 10 kilometers (6 miles), the U.S. Geological Survey said.

The Joint Australian Tsunami Warning Center said there was no tsunami alert for Australia or Antarctica.


Serbia expels Croatian doctor married to Serb over security threat

Serbia expels Croatian doctor married to Serb over security threat
Updated 47 min 59 sec ago
Follow

Serbia expels Croatian doctor married to Serb over security threat

Serbia expels Croatian doctor married to Serb over security threat
  • Stojanovic Ivkovic is one of about 20 Croatian citizens who have been ordered to leave Serbia in the past three months
  • Dozens of others have been refused entry at the border.

BELGRADE: Arian Stojanovic Ivkovic, 31, a Croatian doctor who lives in Belgrade with her Serbian husband and a three-year-old daughter, was given one week's notice to leave the country last week and told she was a security threat.
She said a police officer called and said there was a problem with her residence.

“When I went to the police station I was given a piece of paper that said I was an unacceptable threat to the security of Serbia and its citizens. I was given one week to leave,” she said.

“How can you pack up a life in a week?”

Stojanovic Ivkovic is one of about 20 Croatian citizens who have been ordered to leave Serbia in the past three months, according to Croatian embassy data.

Dozens of others have been refused entry at the border.

Relations between Croatia and Serbia, which fought a bitter war in the 1990s, have been strained in recent months after a wave of anti-corruption protests, which Serbian pro-government media have accused Croatia's security service of backing.

Stojanovic Ivkovic said the only thing she can think of that may account for her being identified as a security threat after 12 years of living in Serbia was her support for the student-led protests, which included attending several rallies.

“However, we do not know if this is the real reason,” she said. “We as a family we do not deserve this.”

She has filed a complaint and hopes she will be allowed to stay with her family.

Serbia’s Interior Ministry did not respond to a Reuters request for comment.

“We are extremely worried that in three days last week we had five cases of expulsion (of Croatian citizens),” Hidajet Biscevic, the Croatian ambassador to Serbia, said.


UK Supreme Court rules that equalities law defines a woman as someone born biologically female

UK Supreme Court rules that equalities law defines a woman as someone born biologically female
Updated 16 April 2025
Follow

UK Supreme Court rules that equalities law defines a woman as someone born biologically female

UK Supreme Court rules that equalities law defines a woman as someone born biologically female
  • The ruling means that a transgender person with a certificate that recognizes them as female should not be considered a woman for equality purposes

LONDON: The Supreme Court ruled Wednesday that the UK equalities law defines a woman as someone born biologically female.

Justice Patrick Hodge said five judges at the court had ruled unanimously that “the terms ‘woman’ and ‘sex’ in the Equality Act refer to a biological woman.”

The ruling means that a transgender person with a certificate that recognizes them as female should not be considered a woman for equality purposes.

The case stems from a 2018 law passed by the Scottish Parliament stating that there should be a 50 percent female representation on the boards of Scottish public bodies. That law included transgender women in its definition of women.

The women’s rights group successfully challenged that law, arguing that its redefinition of “woman” went beyond parliament’s powers.

Scottish officials then issued guidance stating that the definition of “woman” included a transgender woman with a gender recognition certificate.

FWS sought to overturn that.

“Not tying the definition of sex to its ordinary meaning means that public boards could conceivably comprise of 50 percent men, and 50 percent men with certificates, yet still lawfully meet the targets for female representation,” the group’s director Trina Budge said.

The challenge was rejected by a court in 2022, but the group was granted permission last year to take its case to the Supreme Court.

What are the arguments?

Aidan O’Neill, a lawyer for FWS, told the Supreme Court judges – three men and two women – that under the Equality Act “sex” should refer to biological sex and as understood “in ordinary, everyday language.”

“Our position is your sex, whether you are a man or a woman or a girl or a boy is determined from conception in utero, even before one’s birth, by one’s body,” he said on Tuesday. “It is an expression of one’s bodily reality. It is an immutable biological state.”

The women’s rights group counts among its supporters author J.K. Rowling, who reportedly donated tens of thousands of pounds to back its work. The “Harry Potter” writer has been vocal in arguing that the rights for trans women should not come at the expense of those who are born biologically female.

Opponents, including Amnesty International, said excluding transgender people from sex discrimination protections conflicts with human rights.

Amnesty submitted a brief in court saying it was concerned about the deterioration of the rights for trans people in the UK and abroad.

“A blanket policy of barring trans women from single-sex services is not a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate aim,” the human rights group said.