Amid drastic surge in internal displacement, UN urges governments to find long-term solutions

Special Amid drastic surge in internal displacement, UN urges governments to find long-term solutions
Displaced Palestinians flee northern Gaza, Dec. 4, 2024. (Reuters)
Short Url
Updated 05 December 2024
Follow

Amid drastic surge in internal displacement, UN urges governments to find long-term solutions

Amid drastic surge in internal displacement, UN urges governments to find long-term solutions
  • Much of increase driven by conflicts in Ukraine, Gaza, Lebanon, DRC and Sudan, UN special adviser tells Arab News
  • At nearly 76m, the number of internally displaced persons worldwide has ‘doubled in just the last 10 years’

NEW YORK: Nearly 76 million people around the world are currently displaced within their own countries, according to the UN’s special advisor on internal displacement, Robert Piper.

This staggering number highlights the growing crisis of internally displaced persons who, unlike refugees, have not crossed international borders and often remain hidden from global attention.

Speaking in New York at a conference marking the end of his mandate, Piper highlighted the severe challenges in addressing the plight of IDPs, particularly those displaced by conflict, disasters and criminal violence.

“Seventy-six million people have lost their homes, livelihoods and communities. They make up the overwhelming majority of the world’s 120 million displaced persons,” he said.

“Yet they remain largely invisible, with no dedicated global agency or global treaty or compact for IDPs, no international day that singles them out, and their numbers have doubled in just the last 10 years.”

Piper told Arab News that in the past five years alone, 20 million IDPs were added to the global total, with much of the increase coming from conflict zones such as Ukraine, Gaza, Lebanon, the Democratic Republic of Congo and Sudan, “which has unfortunately broken all the records.”

Climate change is exacerbating the problem as extreme weather events displace millions each year.

“There has been a tremendous amount of disaster-induced displacement during the past five years as well. Pakistan’s floods displaced 8 million people. The Turkish earthquake displaced millions,” Piper said.

“But the difference is that generally speaking, people are getting home much more quickly after disasters,” whereas tens of millions of people displaced because of conflicts remain so for many years, he added.

So the UN’s approach has shifted in recent years, with a growing recognition that long-term solutions, not just humanitarian aid, are required.

Piper emphasized that while governments in countries such as Iraq, Somalia and Nigeria have taken significant steps toward resolving displacement issues, more needs to be done.

These countries have developed national strategies to assist displaced populations, with Iraq and Libya, for example, committing to fully fund their own solutions processes.

Somalia’s recent commitment of $140 million for land purchases to integrate displaced people marks another important milestone.

Piper told Arab News that “pathways to solutions” involve ensuring displaced people have access to housing, services and livelihoods.

They also focus on compensation and justice, helping IDPs restore their legal rights and integrate into local communities.

“It’s access to services, restoring those services if they’ve gone home, or giving them access to services in their place of displacement, if that’s where they choose to settle,” Piper said.

“It’s about access to a livelihood of some kind, whether it’s agricultural or urban. These are the fairly obvious kinds of conditions that everyone needs to rebuild a life.

“Perhaps less obvious are other elements of this work, compensation and justice, a recognition of what has happened to them, what they’ve lost, their inclusion in civic life.

“Often this involves allowing them to be elected, to vote in their local constituency. And in some cases it’s restoring their documentation, their identity because, indeed, many IDPs are displaced so rapidly that they lose their legal documentation.”

Piper stressed that the core of these efforts is government leadership. “Governments must take responsibility, but they also need the right kind of support from the international system, more investment in development, better capacity building, and less focus on short-term fixes,” he said.

The UN has also reorganized its structures to better support governments in resolving displacement issues.

New funding mechanisms, such as the Solutions Fund, have been created to accelerate progress, while financial institutions such as the World Bank and the African Development Bank have begun incorporating IDP solutions into their assessments and scorecards.

Piper also highlighted the challenges of working in conflict zones where governments may be part of the problem rather than the solution.

He pointed to Gaza, Myanmar and Sudan, where ongoing violence and political instability make it impossible to implement the UN’s model for long-term displacement solutions.

“In places like Gaza, the conditions aren’t conducive to solutions at this moment,” he said. “The UN’s role is primarily focused on humanitarian aid and protection, not on the long-term solutions we’re advocating in other countries.”

Piper highlighted the importance of moving beyond humanitarian assistance to address the root causes of displacement and ensure long-term stability for displaced populations.

He pointed to the UN’s efforts to make IDP solutions a priority at the international level, including discussions at climate change conferences and other forums.

Piper expressed confidence that the groundwork has been laid for more effective solutions, but stressed that continued global attention and investment are critical. “The numbers are rising, and without continued progress, this crisis will only deepen,” he warned.

The focus on long-term solutions, he said, is not only about addressing the immediate needs of IDPs, but also about creating the conditions for them to rebuild their lives and communities sustainably.


An aircraft is down near Washington’s Reagan Airport, and takeoffs and landings are halted

An aircraft is down near Washington’s Reagan Airport, and takeoffs and landings are halted
Updated 50 min 32 sec ago
Follow

An aircraft is down near Washington’s Reagan Airport, and takeoffs and landings are halted

An aircraft is down near Washington’s Reagan Airport, and takeoffs and landings are halted

ARLINGTON, Virginia: An aircraft went down near Ronald Reagan National Airport on Wednesday night, and all takeoffs and landings have been halted, according to the airport and law enforcement.
Multiple helicopters, including those from the US Park Police and the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department and US military, were flying over the scene of the incident in the Potomac River. D.C. Fire and EMS said on X that fireboats were on the scene.
Washington, D.C., police said on the social platform X that multiple agencies are conducting a search and rescue effort in the Potomac River after an aircraft crash.
Video from an observation camera at the nearby Kennedy Center shows two sets of lights consistent with aircraft appearing to join in a fireball.
The airport said emergency personnel were responding to “an aircraft incident on the airfield.”
No other details were immediately available.


Trump issues orders to promote school choice, end “anti-American” teaching

Trump issues orders to promote school choice, end “anti-American” teaching
Updated 30 January 2025
Follow

Trump issues orders to promote school choice, end “anti-American” teaching

Trump issues orders to promote school choice, end “anti-American” teaching
  • Order prioritizes federal funding for school choice programs
  • Second order aims to block federal funding related to “gender ideology or discriminatory equity ideology” in schools

President Donald Trump on Wednesday signed executive orders to promote parental choice in school selection and end federal funding for curricula that he called the “indoctrination” of students in “anti-American” ideologies on race and gender.
The two directives, which come a week after Trump was sworn into his second term of office, are in keeping with his campaign promise to remake the country’s education system in line with a rigorous conservative agenda that Democrats say could undermine public schools.
The first order directs the Department of Education to issue guidance on how states can use federal education funds to support “choice initiatives,” without providing further details.
“It is the policy of my Administration to support parents in choosing and directing the upbringing and education of their children,” the president said in the order. “Too many children do not thrive in their assigned, government-run K-12 school.”
His second directive aims to stop schools from using federal funds for curriculum, teacher certification and other purposes related to “gender ideology or discriminatory equity ideology.”
“In recent years, however, parents have witnessed schools indoctrinate their children in radical, anti-American ideologies while deliberately blocking parental oversight,” it reads.
Trump and his allies throughout the campaign have accused public schools of teaching white children to be ashamed of themselves and their ancestors due to the country’s history of slavery and discrimination against people of color.
The second order, without evidence, claims that teachers have been “demanding acquiescence” to concepts of “white privilege” or “unconscious bias” and thereby promoting racism and undermining national unity.
The executive order will have a “chilling effect” on subjects related to race and ethnicity in schools, said Basil Smikle Jr., a political strategist.
“I would imagine that it would restrict the kind of reading materials that are even available to students outside of the classroom,” he said.
Although that order does not invoke the term “critical race theory” by name, it employs the language often used by CRT opponents to criticize teaching about institutional racism.
A once-obscure academic concept, the theory has become a fixture in the fierce US debate over how to teach children about the country’s history and structural racism. An academic framework most often taught in law schools but not in primary and secondary schools, it rests on the premise that racial bias — intentional or not — is baked into US laws and institutions.
Conservatives have invoked the term to denounce curricula they consider too liberal or excessively focused on America’s history of racial discrimination. Supporters say understanding institutional racism is necessary to address inequality.
Christina Greer, an associate professor of political science at Fordham University, said the order came as no surprise.
“As a candidate, he said there was radical indoctrination of students,” she said. “He’s making sure to frighten students and educators across the country so they can’t teach the real history of the United States.”
It was not clear how the order issued on Wednesday would affect how the history of race relations is taught in American schools. During his inaugural address last week, Trump criticized education that “teaches our children to be ashamed of themselves — in many cases, to hate our country.”

SCHOOL CHOICE

The first order also directs the US Department of Education to prioritize federal funding for school choice programs, a longstanding goal for conservatives who say public schools are failing to meet academic standards while pushing liberal ideas.
Many Democrats and teachers’ unions, on the other hand, say school choice undermines the public system that educates 50 million US children.
Federal test scores released by the National Assessment of Educational Progress on Wednesday underscored the challenge faced by educators in the wake of widespread learning loss during the COVID-19 pandemic.
The scores showed that one-third of eighth graders tested below NAEP’s “basic” reading level, the most in the test’s three-decade history, while some 40 percent of fourth-graders also fell below that basic threshold.
That executive order also directs US states on how they could use block grants to support alternatives to public education, such as private and religious schools.
US education is primarily funded via states and local taxes, with federal sources accounting for about 14 percent of the funding of public K-12 schools, according to Census data.
Trump’s order could affect some $30 billion to $40 billion in federal grants, estimated Frederick Hess, an education expert at the right-leaning American Enterprise Institute.
“This stuff is directionally significant,” said Hess, adding that Trump’s directive represented “the most emphatic support for school choice we’ve ever seen at the federal level.”
The first order also calls for allowing military families to use Pentagon funds to send their children to the school of their choosing. It also mandates that Native American families with students in the Bureau of Indian Education be allowed to use federal funds in selecting their schools.
A number of Republican-leaning states have in recent years adopted universal or near-universal school choice policies, paving the way for vouchers or other methods that allocate taxpayer funds for homeschooling or private tuition.
Josh Cowen, a professor of education policy at Michigan State University, said that Trump’s executive order is aimed at sending “an aggressive statement about his position on vouchers” even if his power to reallocate funds is limited.
Cowen said the bigger potential financial impact on education lies with a bill reintroduced in Congress this week that would create a federal school voucher program with an estimated $10 billion in annual tax credits. 


Rohingya refugees stranded on boat off Indonesia

Rohingya refugees stranded on boat off Indonesia
Updated 30 January 2025
Follow

Rohingya refugees stranded on boat off Indonesia

Rohingya refugees stranded on boat off Indonesia
  • Authorities block migrants from disembarking at tourist beach ‘in case they escape’

JAKARTA: At least 75 Rohingya refugees including four children were stranded aboard a migrant boat off the coast of western Indonesia on Wednesday after authorities blocked them from landing at a tourist beach.

Security officers prevented the Rohingya from disembarking at Leuge beach in Aceh province and ordered them to stay aboard the boat. Police were deployed to monitor the beach, while local residents took photos of the boat and provided the refugees with food.
“For now, they are not allowed to disembark, considering today is a public holiday. Many tourist activities are taking place ... there are concerns that they might blend in with the crowd and escape,” local official Rizalihadi said.
“The temporary policy is for them to remain on the boat while waiting for representatives from the UN High Commissioner for Refugees and the International Organization for Migration to arrive.”

The Muslim minority Rohingya are persecuted in Myanmar, and thousands risk their lives each year on long and dangerous sea journeys to Malaysia or Indonesia.


Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension

Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension
Updated 30 January 2025
Follow

Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension

Meta agrees to pay $25 million to settle lawsuit from Trump after Jan. 6 suspension

WASHINGTON: Meta has agreed to pay $25 million to settle a lawsuit filed by President Donald Trump against the company after it suspended his accounts following the Jan. 6, 2021, attack on the Capitol, according to three people familiar with the matter.
It’s the latest instance of a large corporation settling litigation with the president, who has threatened retribution on his critics and rivals, and comes as Meta and its CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, have joined other large technology companies in trying to ingratiate themselves with the new Trump administration.
The people familiar with the matter spoke on the condition of anonymity Wednesday to discuss the agreement. Two people said that terms of the agreement include $22 million going to the nonprofit that will become Trump’s future presidential library and the balance going to legal fees and other litigants.
Zuckerberg visited Trump in November at his private Florida club as part of a series of technology, business and government officials to make a pilgrimage to Palm Beach to try to mend fences with the incoming president. At the dinner, Trump brought up the litigation and suggested they try to resolve it, kickstarting two months of negotiations between the parties, the people said.
Meta also made a $1 million donation to Trump’s inaugural committee and Zuckerberg was among several billionaires granted prime seating during Trump’s swearing-in last week in the Capitol Rotunda, along with Google’s Sundar Pichai, Amazon’s Jeff Bezos and Elon Musk, who now owns the platform X, formerly known as Twitter.
Ahead of Trump’s inauguration, Meta also announced that it was dropping fact-checking on its platform — a longtime priority of Trump and his allies.
Trump filed the suit months after leaving office, calling the action by the social media companies “illegal, shameful censorship of the American people.”
Twitter, Facebook and Google are all private companies, and users must agree to their terms of service to use their products. Under Section 230 of the 1996 Communications Decency Act, social media platforms are allowed to moderate their services by removing posts that, for instance, are obscene or violate the services’ own standards, so long as they are acting in “good faith.” The law also generally exempts Internet companies from liability for the material that users post.
But Trump and some other politicians have long argued that X, formerly known as Twitter, Facebook and other social media platforms, have abused that protection and should lose their immunity — or at least have it curtailed.
The Meta settlement comes after ABC News agreed last month to pay $15 million toward Trump’s presidential library to settle a defamation lawsuit over anchor George Stephanopoulos’ inaccurate on-air assertion that the president-elect had been found civilly liable for raping writer E. Jean Carroll.
The network also agreed to pay $1 million in legal fees to the law firm of Trump’s attorney, Alejandro Brito.
The settlement agreement describes ABC’s presidential library payment as a “charitable contribution,” with the money earmarked for a non-profit organization that is being established in connection with the yet-to-be-built library.
The Wall Street Journal was first to report on the settlement.


Trump officials discussing tightening curbs on Nvidia’s China sales, sources say

Trump officials discussing tightening curbs on Nvidia’s China sales, sources say
Updated 30 January 2025
Follow

Trump officials discussing tightening curbs on Nvidia’s China sales, sources say

Trump officials discussing tightening curbs on Nvidia’s China sales, sources say
  • Conversations to restrict shipments of those chips to China are in very early stages

US President Donald Trump’s administration is considering tightening restrictions on artificial intelligence leader Nvidia’s sales of its H20 chips designed for the China market, three people familiar with the matter said.
Conversations to restrict shipments of those chips to China are in very early stages among Trump officials, the people said, adding the idea has been under consideration since Democratic former President Joe Biden’s administration. H20 chips can be used to run AI software and were designed to comply with existing US curbs on shipments to China, spearheaded by Biden.
The White House did not respond to requests for comment. Nvidia said in a statement it is “ready to work with the administration as it pursues its own approach to AI.”
Nvidia shares, which were already down for the day, added slightly to losses after the news, first reported by Bloomberg.
Worries are mounting that China is catching up to the US in AI development after China’s DeepSeek
last week launched a free assistant
it says uses less data at a fraction of the cost of incumbent players’ models, possibly marking a turning point in the level of investment needed for AI.
“This topic has been discussed for more than half a year,” among high-level officials, said Lennart Heim, a researcher at RAND, saying it was a recommendation made during the Biden administration as well. “DeepSeek highlights it,” he added.
Biden, who left office this month, put in place a raft of restrictions barring exports of AI chips to China and capping their shipment to a host of other countries. However, some AI chips, including Nvidia’s H20 can still be lawfully shipped to China.