Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is ‘not a friend of peace,’ says Israeli analyst

Short Url
Updated 27 August 2024
Follow

Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is ‘not a friend of peace,’ says Israeli analyst

Prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu is ‘not a friend of peace,’ says Israeli analyst
  • 2-state solution is still possible but if conflict with Palestinians is to end, there must be change of leadership in Israel, Yossi Mekelberg tells ‘Ray Hanania Radio Show’
  • He says a 2-state solution remains the best option for peace but other scenarios that fully recognize the rights of both peoples should also be considered

CHICAGO: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netaynahu is “not a friend of peace” and is using his right-wing government coalition and the conflict with the Palestinians to further delay his own corruption trial and avoid justice, a leading Israeli analyst said this week.

Yossi Mekelberg, an associate fellow with the Middle East and North Africa Program at Chatham House in London, told the “Ray Hanania Radio Show” that Netanyahu has been deliberately prolonging the war in Gaza to serve his own interests, rather than the interests of the people on both sides.
An important change that is required from the international community if hopes for a two-state solution are to be salvaged is an expansion of the peace process to increase the role of other nations besides the US and help change the discourse surrounding the conflict, he said, while Washington must consider what is the best path forward for achieving its own goals.

“What about the American interest; where does the American interest lie?” asked Mekelberg, who is also a columnist for Arab News. “(US Secretary of State Antony) Blinken, now on his ninth visit to the region, is almost begging for a ceasefire.
“It’s (bad) enough that Netanyahu is delaying and delaying and adding new conditions (to the peace negotiations), while (the conflict) is linked also to the possibility or the threat and the danger of a regional war. This is where it intersects with the American interest: the implications of a regional war for American interests. So the discussion should also be what is good for America.

“I think the United States is crucial (to the process). What I don’t like, sometimes, when it comes to this discussion with Europeans, whenever I have a discussion (about the conflict) with officials from the European Union they say it’s only the Americans (who have the power to end the conflict). I think the EU can play a part. I think the (Arab) region can play a very important part.

“So just to look and say there is only one peace broker … that’s not right. Especially when one side doesn’t really trust this peace broker. So, I think we need a coalition of peace brokers.”

Mekelberg said a key factor that continues to fuel the conflict is Netanyahu’s partnership with far-right parties within his coalition government.

Netanyahu was indicted on Nov. 21, 2019, on charges of breach of trust, accepting bribes and fraud. A trial began in Israel on May 24, 2020, but has yet to conclude, Mekelberg said, because of the efforts by Netanyahu’s right-wing government to undermine judicial and legal processes in Israel.

“They say that every country gets the leader it deserves; I think in the case of the Israeli government, the punishment is way bigger than the sin,” he added.

“So I think Israel deserves better leadership. You know, the only conclusion I can reach is that Netanyahu is not interested in a peace-based, two-state solution — which for all the faults and all the misgivings that one might have about a two-state solution, it’s still the best alternative, the best option.”

Mekelberg believes part of Netanyahu’s approach to Hamas prior to the Oct. 7 attacks by Hamas on Israel last year, including the funneling of funding to the group, was to maintain “the divisions among Palestinians, between Fatah and Hamas, the West Bank and Gaza” with the aim of “derailing any hope of a two-state solution.” He added: “So if this is the solution that can bring peace, I don’t think Netanyahu is in any shape or form a supporter of it.
“At the end of the day, neither this government nor Netanyahu are friends of peace … it’s more a government that (seeks) the annexation of the West Bank, and some even talk about the occupation or reoccupation of Gaza and building settlements there.” Mekelberg said the opposition from Netanyahu and his government to a two-state solution plays into their own political interests, is fueling the conflict between Israel and the Palestinians and preventing peace.

He repeated that a two-state solution remains the best option but other scenarios for peace that recognize the rights of both peoples should also be considered, including a confederation of some form.

“I think (we have seen) so many final nails in the coffin of the two-state solution … it’s full of final nails,” he said.

“Now, the facts on the ground — (including) the expansion of settlements, the settler population (of) more than 700,000 and the encircling of Jerusalem with settlements — have made (peace) more difficult.”

However, Mekelberg added, peace can come in many forms.

“One of the options is to look into confederation,” he added. “You have two states but because of the size of the territory, it doesn’t need hard borders; you need to think of an almost EU-style (model) where people can move from one side to the other freely. Look at Jerusalem as the capital of both but with no need for more walls. Actually, walls should come down.”
You can hear the full interview with Yossi Mekelberg on Thursday, Aug. 29 at 5 p.m Eastern Standard Time and on Monday, Sept. 2 on WNZK 690 AM radio in Michigan, or at ArabNews.com/RayRadioShow.


President Donald Trump appeals his New York hush money conviction

President Donald Trump appeals his New York hush money conviction
Updated 29 January 2025
Follow

President Donald Trump appeals his New York hush money conviction

President Donald Trump appeals his New York hush money conviction
  • Trump’s lawyers filed a notice of appeal Wednesday, asking the state’s mid-level appeals court to overturn his conviction
  • Trump’s lawyers will have an opportunity to expand on their grievances in subsequent court filings

NEW YORK: President Donald Trump has appealed his hush money conviction, seeking to erase the verdict that made him the first person with a criminal record to win the office.
Trump’s lawyers filed a notice of appeal Wednesday, asking the state’s mid-level appeals court to overturn his conviction last May on 34 counts of falsifying business records.
The case, involving an alleged scheme to hide a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels during Trump’s 2016 Republican campaign, was the only one of his criminal cases to go to trial.
A notice of appeal starts the appeals process in New York. Trump’s lawyers will have an opportunity to expand on their grievances in subsequent court filings.
The Manhattan district attorney’s office, which prosecuted the case, will have a chance to respond in court papers. A message seeking comment was left with the office Wednesday.
Trump hired a new legal team from the firm Sullivan & Cromwell LLP to handle the appeal, spearheaded by the firm’s co-chair Robert J. Giuffra Jr.
Giuffra and four other lawyers from his firm stepped in after the president tabbed his two main defense lawyers, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, for top positions in his administration’s Justice Department.
“President Donald J. Trump’s appeal is important for the rule of law, New York’s reputation as a global business, financial and legal center, as well as for the presidency and all public officials,” Giuffra said in a statement provided by a Trump spokesperson.


Norwegian mass murderer Breivik loses prison condition case

Norwegian mass murderer Breivik loses prison condition case
Updated 29 January 2025
Follow

Norwegian mass murderer Breivik loses prison condition case

Norwegian mass murderer Breivik loses prison condition case
  • “The Court of Appeal considers that the restrictions are sufficiently justified,” the three judges said in their ruling
  • They also said that the prison authorities have put in place sufficient measures to compensate for his relative isolation in prison

OSLO: A Norwegian court on Wednesday rejected an appeal brought by right-wing extremist and mass killer Anders Behring Breivik, who claims his prison conditions are a violation of human rights.
Breivik, who killed 77 people in July 2011, has regularly complained about his prison conditions, despite them including three private cells, two Guinea pigs, a flat-screen television and a video game console.
Claiming that he has been “treated like an animal,” Breivik has sued the Norwegian state on several occasions in a bid to get improvements to compensate for his relative isolation.
He has argued that this isolation constitutes a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which prohibits “inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
His case was struck down by a district court in February, after which he appealed.
“The Court of Appeal considers that the restrictions are sufficiently justified by the risk of violence that persists,” the three judges said in their ruling Wednesday.
They also said that the prison authorities have put in place sufficient measures to compensate for his relative isolation in prison.
The court also dismissed Breivik’s appeal for an easing of the filtering of his mail, for which he also invoked the ECHR on the right to correspondence.
On July 22, 2011, Breivik set off a bomb near government offices in Oslo, killing eight people, before gunning down 69 others, mostly teens, at a Labour Party youth wing summer camp on the island of Utoya.
He said he had killed his victims because they embraced multiculturalism.
He was sentenced in 2012 to 21 years in prison, which can be extended as long as he is considered a threat.


More Indians losing hope of improved quality of life under Modi, survey shows

More Indians losing hope of improved quality of life under Modi, survey shows
Updated 29 January 2025
Follow

More Indians losing hope of improved quality of life under Modi, survey shows

More Indians losing hope of improved quality of life under Modi, survey shows
  • More than 37% respondents in pre-budget survey said they expect overall quality of life for ordinary people to deteriorate over next year
  • Nearly two-thirds of survey respondents said inflation had remained unchecked and prices had gone up since Modi became prime minister

NEW DELHI: More Indians are becoming less hopeful about their quality of life as stagnant wages and higher living costs cloud future prospects, a survey showed, in disappointing news for Prime Minister Narendra Modi ahead of this week’s annual budget.
More than 37 percent of respondents in a pre-budget survey said they expect the overall quality of life for ordinary people to deteriorate over the next year, the highest such percentage since 2013, findings released by polling agency C-Voter showed on Wednesday. Modi has been prime minister since 2014.
C-Voter said it polled 5,269 adults across Indian states for this survey. Persistent eye-watering food inflation has squeezed Indian household budgets and crimped spending power, and the world’s fifth-largest economy is expected to post its slowest pace of growth in four years.
Nearly two-thirds of survey respondents said inflation had remained unchecked and that prices had gone up since Modi became prime minister, while more than half said the rate of inflation had “adversely” affected their quality of life.
Modi, in the nation’s annual budget this week, is expected to announce measures to shore up faltering economic growth, lift disposable incomes and placate a stretched middle class.
Nearly half of respondents said their personal income had remained the same over the last year while expenses rose, while nearly two-thirds said rising expenses had become difficult to manage, the survey showed.
Despite world-beating economic growth, India’s job market offers insufficient opportunities for its large youthful population to earn regular wages.
In the last budget, India earmarked nearly $24 billion to be spent over five years on various schemes to create jobs but those programs have not yet been implemented as discussions on the details drag on.


German government says criticism of Musk does not mean exit from X

German government says criticism of Musk does not mean exit from X
Updated 29 January 2025
Follow

German government says criticism of Musk does not mean exit from X

German government says criticism of Musk does not mean exit from X
  • “It has no repercussions,” said the spokesperson

BERLIN: German Chancellor Olaf Scholz’s sharp criticism of Elon Musk’s backing of right-wing parties in the European Union does not influence how the German government uses his social media platform X, a government spokesperson said on Wednesday.
“It has no repercussions. Our statement still holds that we are looking at and weighing up what is happening there case by case,” said the spokesperson in a press conference, adding there was no pre-defined “red line.”
Scholz on Tuesday described Musk’s backing of right-wing parties in the EU as “really disgusting,” saying it was hindering democracy in the bloc.


UN refugee agency taking ‘precautionary measures’ amid US aid freeze

UN refugee agency taking ‘precautionary measures’ amid US aid freeze
Updated 29 January 2025
Follow

UN refugee agency taking ‘precautionary measures’ amid US aid freeze

UN refugee agency taking ‘precautionary measures’ amid US aid freeze
  • The UNHCR said it did not yet have “specific information” about how the Trump administration’s decision would impact the agency
  • The spokesperson said the precautionary measures being implemented “touch upon travel, workshops, supply procurement and the hiring of new colleagues“

GENEVA: The UN refugee agency said Wednesday that it was taking a string of temporary measures as it faces “funding uncertainty” following a US decision to freeze virtually all foreign aid.
“We have taken note of the decision by the new US administration to pause allocation of funds to foreign assistance programs,” a UNHCR spokesperson told AFP in an email.
“While we are still assessing the impact of the new US administration’s decision, including possible exceptions, we are implementing a series of temporary precautionary measures to mitigate the impact of this funding uncertainty.”
President Donald Trump on returning TO office last week ordered a 90-day pause to review assistance by the United States, the world’s largest foreign aid donor in dollar terms.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio followed up by freezing virtually all funding, though he specified exemptions for emergency food, as well as military assistance to Israel and Egypt.
In a follow-up memo on Tuesday after an outcry from aid groups, Rubio clarified that other “humanitarian assistance” besides food would also be exempt during the review period.
The UNHCR said it did not yet have “specific information” about how the Trump administration’s decision would impact the agency, which has long counted the United States as by far its biggest donor.
In 2024, the United States contributed $2.05 billion to the UNHCR’s total budget of over $10.6 billion.
The spokesperson said the precautionary measures being implemented “touch upon travel, workshops, supply procurement and the hiring of new colleagues.”
The UNHCR noted that it had “worked closely with the United States for decades.”
“We are looking forward to engaging actively and constructively with the US government as a trusted partner,” the spokesperson said.
“Our focus is to maximize the impact, cost-effectiveness, and efficiency of our operations around the globe, with the aim of saving lives, protecting families fleeing war and persecution, fostering stability in unstable places, advancing self-reliance, and reducing dependency on humanitarian aid.”
UNHCR is not the only UN agency feeling the burn.
The World Health Organization said last week that it was reviewing its priorities after Trump ordered the full withdrawal of the United States, traditionally the agency’s largest donor.
WHO was “freezing recruitment, except in the most critical areas” and was dramatically cutting back on travel expenditures, the organization’s chief Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus said in a letter sent to staff on Thursday.
Tedros said the UN health agency hoped the new administration would reconsider its decision, noting that it was open to dialogue on preserving the relationship.