British minister cites Islamophobia as motivation for far-right violence in UK

The UK’s home secretary on Monday pointed to Islamophobia for the first time as a motivation for far-right violence in several cities that has seen widespread damage and nearly 400 arrests. (AFP)
The UK’s home secretary on Monday pointed to Islamophobia for the first time as a motivation for far-right violence in several cities that has seen widespread damage and nearly 400 arrests. (AFP)
Short Url
Updated 05 August 2024
Follow

British minister cites Islamophobia as motivation for far-right violence in UK

British minister cites Islamophobia as motivation for far-right violence in UK
  • Amnesty chief wants action on ‘root cause’ of racism

LONDON: The UK’s home secretary on Monday pointed to Islamophobia for the first time as a motivation for far-right violence in several cities that has seen widespread damage and nearly 400 arrests.

Yvette Cooper was appearing on ITV’s morning television show “This Morning” and was asked why the Labour government had not used the term when talking about the violence, which broke out on Tuesday following a stabbing in which three children were killed.

“You’re right that there has been a range of different things driving this, including far-right extremism,” Cooper told the program.

“We have certainly seen some targeted attacks on mosques, and that clearly reflects Islamophobia, and people shouldn’t be targeted for their faith or for the color of their skin.

“We’ve also seen some looting, some response of local criminals just getting involved at the periphery on streets as well. None of these people speak for Britain,” she added.

Cooper’s department, the Home Office, said over the weekend it would deploy extra police and security for mosques under new emergency measures, The Telegraph reported.

A suspended Labour MP, Zarah Sultana, also appeared on “This Morning” and pushed the government to do more to call out hatred against Muslims.

“This question about naming it as Islamophobia is really important, because that allows us to shape our response,” she said.

“If we’re not identifying what is happening, the language that is being used and what this is about, we’re not going to be able to address this fundamentally,” she added.

Also on Monday, the head of Amnesty International UK said the government must get serious about tackling the “root cause of racism that plagues” British society.

“The widespread violence and hate crimes we’ve witnessed over the last few days are utterly unacceptable,” Sacha Deshmukh said.

“It’s disgusting to see hotels housing people seeking sanctuary set on fire, mosques and businesses attacked, and people targeted because of the color of their skin, their faith or their country of origin,” he added.

He said the violence was inspired by the rhetoric of politicians who had “scapegoated” refugees and migrants.

“Events of the last few days have been reported as ‘anti-immigration protests’ or ‘pro-British demonstrations’ and they should not be labeled as such. What we are seeing are clearly violent racist attacks targeting specific communities,” he said.

“Above all, the government must address the root causes of racism, Islamophobia and xenophobia that plagues our society — and this includes actively calling out and addressing the dangerous rhetoric of politicians and commentators on social media and elsewhere.”


Trump’s Pentagon lashes out at retired general Milley, yanks security detail

Trump’s Pentagon lashes out at retired general Milley, yanks security detail
Updated 8 sec ago
Follow

Trump’s Pentagon lashes out at retired general Milley, yanks security detail

Trump’s Pentagon lashes out at retired general Milley, yanks security detail
  • Milley served as Joint Chiefs chairman under Trump and Biden
  • The retired general has called Trump “fascist to the core“

WASHINGTON: New US Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, in one of his first acts in the job since being appointed by President Donald Trump, has revoked the personal security detail and security clearance for retired Army general and former chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Mark Milley.
Milley, who served as the top US military officer during some of Trump’s first presidential term, became a leading critic of him after retiring as a four-star general in 2023 during former President Joe Biden’s administration and has faced death threats. Milley will also face an inquiry by the Pentagon inspector general’s office into his conduct that could lead to him being bumped down in rank.
Among other criticisms, Milley was quoted as calling Trump “fascist to the core” in the book “War” by journalist Bob Woodward published last year.
The moves to punish Milley, which also include removal of his two portraits in the Pentagon, came as the Pentagon mobilizes to support Trump’s immigration crackdown and to conform to his conservative revamp of policies on personnel.
These include executive orders that aim to ban transgender people from the armed forces, elimination of diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives and to reinstate thousands of troops who were kicked out of the military for refusing orders to take COVID-19 vaccines during the pandemic.
Hegseth’s moves may have a chilling effect on the Pentagon top brass, whose jobs call for them to provide unvarnished military advice even when it runs counter to policies they are tasked to execute.
The Pentagon said the decisions on Milley were meant to underscore the importance of the chain of command. Trump, as president, is commander in chief of the US military.
“Undermining the chain of command is corrosive to our national security, and restoring accountability is a priority for the Defense Department under President Trump’s leadership,” said Hegseth’s chief of staff, Joe Kasper.
Democratic lawmakers slammed the move.
“The administration has placed Milley and his family in grave danger, and they have an obligation to immediately restore his federal protection,” Senator Jack Reed, the top Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee, said in a statement.
Some former government officials are given security detail after retirement because of the threats they may face. Trump has taken away security details of other former officials since taking office, including that of his former national security adviser John Bolton as well as former top diplomat Mike Pompeo.
In the aftermath of Trump’s supporters storming the US Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, in a failed attempt to overturn his 2020 election loss to Biden, Milley called China to reassure Beijing of US stability. Trump, in a social media post, described the phone call as “an act so egregious that, in times gone by, the punishment would have been DEATH.”
Some Trump supporters, seeing Milley as disloyal to Trump, had wanted him called back to active duty and tried for treason. Milley received a pardon from Biden on the last day of his presidency on Jan. 20 in a move the outgoing president said was aimed at protecting him and others from political persecution.
Hegseth has said he believes there are too many four-star generals and that nobody is above review.
“We won World War Two with seven four-star generals. Today we have 44 four-star generals,” Hegseth said at his confirmation hearing. “There’s an inverse relationship between the size of staffs and victory on the battlefield.”
Hegseth has also lashed out at Milley in his latest book, including a sentence using an expletive toward him.
Milley’s representatives did not immediately respond to a request for comment. The actions against Milley were first reported by Fox News on Tuesday.
A portrait of Mark Esper, army secretary in Trump’s first administration, was also removed from the Pentagon on Wednesday.
Esper, who was also defense secretary in Trump’s first administration, called him a threat to democracy in the run-up to the 2024 election.
A spokesperson for the US Army Center of Military History said the removed portraits remained Army property and will be stored at the Army Museum Support Center at Fort Belvoir, Virginia.
Milley, as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, was Trump’s top military adviser between 2019 and early 2021 and had a dramatic falling out with his boss.
At his retirement ceremony in 2023, Milley took a veiled swipe at Trump, saying US troops take an oath to the Constitution and not a “wannabe dictator.” Trump later that day lashed out at him with a series of insults, calling Milley “slow moving and thinking” and a “moron.” 


Germany’s far-right ‘firewall’ crumbles as migration debate flares

Germany’s far-right ‘firewall’ crumbles as migration debate flares
Updated 3 min 6 sec ago
Follow

Germany’s far-right ‘firewall’ crumbles as migration debate flares

Germany’s far-right ‘firewall’ crumbles as migration debate flares

BERLIN: Weeks before Germany’s elections, a heated immigration debate inflamed by a deadly knife attack triggered a political earthquake Wednesday when conservative parties for the first time cooperated with the far-right AfD.
In what was decried by opponents as a breach of a long-standing taboo, the opposition CDU-CSU relied on backing from the anti-immigration Alternative for Germany (AfD) party to pass a controversial resolution through the national parliament.
Together, and with backing from the smaller FDP, they narrowly passed a toughly-worded motion that harshly attacked the immigration policy of embattled center-left Chancellor Olaf Scholz ahead of February 23 elections.
Though it lacked the force of law, the motion called on the government to permanently police all borders and deny entry to all irregular migrants, whether they claim asylum or not.
Emotions are raw after a knife attack killed two people, including a two-year-old child, in Bavaria last Friday. Police have arrested a 28-year-old Afghan man as the main suspect.
In heated exchanges in the chamber, Scholz had told his election rival, frontrunner Friedrich Merz, that any cooperation with the AfD would be an “unforgivable mistake.”
Scholz told parliament that “since the founding of the Federal Republic of Germany over 75 years ago, there has always been a clear consensus among all democrats in our parliaments: we do not make common cause with the far right.”
Merz angrily fired back at Scholz, recalling a series of bloody attacks blamed on asylum seekers and demanded: “What else needs to happen in Germany?“
“How many more children have to become victims of such acts of violence before you also believe there is a threat to public safety and order?“
The AfD’s top candidate, Alice Weidel, cheered the outcome of the vote in a message on X, calling it “a historic day for Germany, a victory for democracy.”
In the vote, conservative and far-right lawmakers, also backed by the liberal Free Democrats (FDP), passed the resolution with 348 votes in favor and 344 against, with 10 abstentions.
Afterwards, Scholz posted on X that he would “need some time to process what we have experienced together today... That is a bad sign. For the parliament. And also for our country.”
The resolution calls for the “rejection of all attempts to enter the country illegally without exception” because in the neighboring EU countries they arrive from, “they are already safe from persecution.”
The resolution also argues that people required to leave Germany “must be taken into custody immediately,” adding that more detention centers should be built.
It labelled as “clearly dysfunctional” the existing EU regulations on asylum seekers.
The motion also criticized the AfD, which it accused of “using the problems, worries and fears caused by mass illegal migration to stir up xenophobia and spread conspiracy theories.”
Despite this clause, the AfD voted in support of the resolution, helping it to pass despite the strong opposition of Scholz’s Social Democrats and the Greens.
Scholz had urged the CDU not to accept support from “those who fight our democracy, who despise our united Europe, and who have been poisoning the climate in our country for years.”
“This is a serious mistake — an unforgivable mistake.”
Merz, despite growing pushback also from human rights groups and churches, had argued the situation is so dire that he would take whatever support he could get.
After the vote, protesters angered at the CDU accepting the AfD’s support demonstrated outside the center-right party’s headquarters in Berlin, waving banners that read: “Stop the hate.”
“My main feeling is anger — I’m very outraged,” Eva, a 56-year-old protester who gave only her first name, told AFP.
The vote came after Germany was stunned by news last Friday that a man attacked a kindergarten group with a kitchen knife in the Bavarian town of Aschaffenburg.
The attacker killed a two-year-old Moroccan boy and a German man who tried to shield the toddlers, and wounded three more people, including a two-year-old Syrian girl.
Police arrested a 28-year-old Afghan suspect, who was later transferred to a closed psychiatric institution.
In December a Saudi man drove a car through a crowded Christmas market in Magdeburg, and there were also deadly stabbing attacks last year blamed on Syrian and Afghan men.


Trump says will detain 30,000 migrants in Guantanamo

Trump says will detain 30,000 migrants in Guantanamo
Updated 38 min 19 sec ago
Follow

Trump says will detain 30,000 migrants in Guantanamo

Trump says will detain 30,000 migrants in Guantanamo

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump said Wednesday he planned to detain 30,000 “criminal illegal aliens” at the notorious Guantanamo Bay military prison, used for holding terrorism suspects since the 9/11 attacks.
Trump made the shock announcement as he signed a bill allowing the pre-trial detention of undocumented migrants charged with theft and violent crime — named after a US student killed by a Venezuelan immigrant.
He said he was signing an executive order instructing the Pentagon and the Homeland Security department to “begin preparing the 30,000-person migrant facility at Guantanamo Bay,” Trump said at the White House.
“We have 30,000 beds in Guantanamo to detain the worst criminal illegal aliens threatening the American people. Some of them are so bad we don’t even trust the countries to hold them, because we don’t want them coming back,” Trump said.
The Republican said the move would “double our capacity immediately” to hold illegal migrants, amid a huge crackdown that he promised at the start of his second term.
Calling Guantanamo a “tough place to get out of,” Trump said the measures announced on Wednesday would “bring us one step closer to eradicating the scourge of migrant crime in our communities once and for all.”
Trump hosted the parents of Laken Riley, the murdered 22-year-old US nursing student whose name the new migrant crime bill bears, at the White House for the ceremony.
“We will keep Laken’s memory alive in our hearts forever,” Trump said.
“With today’s action, her name will also live forever in the laws of our country, and this is a very important law.”
It is the first bill Trump has signed since his return to the White House, and was passed by the Republican-led US Congress just two days after Trump’s inauguration on January 20.
Jose Antonio Ibarra, 26, a Venezuelan with no papers, was convicted of murdering Riley in 2024 after she went missing on her morning run near the University of Georgia in Athens.
But it was the Guantanamo announcement that will grab the headlines.
The prison was opened in the wake of the 9/11 attacks on the United States by Al-Qaeda.
It has been used to indefinitely hold detainees, many of whom were never charged with a crime, seized during the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq and other operations.
At its peak about 800 people were incarcerated at the site on the eastern tip of Cuba. Testimony from detainees documenting their abuse and torture by US security personnel has long prompted domestic and international criticism.
On Wednesday, Cuban President Miguel Diaz-Canel described Trump’s plan as “an act of brutality,” saying migrants would be held near facilities used by the United States for “torture and illegal detention.”
Former Democratic presidents Joe Biden and Barack Obama pledged to close the prison, but both left office with it still open.


President Donald Trump appeals his New York hush money conviction

President Donald Trump appeals his New York hush money conviction
Updated 29 January 2025
Follow

President Donald Trump appeals his New York hush money conviction

President Donald Trump appeals his New York hush money conviction
  • Trump’s lawyers filed a notice of appeal Wednesday, asking the state’s mid-level appeals court to overturn his conviction
  • Trump’s lawyers will have an opportunity to expand on their grievances in subsequent court filings

NEW YORK: President Donald Trump has appealed his hush money conviction, seeking to erase the verdict that made him the first person with a criminal record to win the office.
Trump’s lawyers filed a notice of appeal Wednesday, asking the state’s mid-level appeals court to overturn his conviction last May on 34 counts of falsifying business records.
The case, involving an alleged scheme to hide a hush money payment to porn actor Stormy Daniels during Trump’s 2016 Republican campaign, was the only one of his criminal cases to go to trial.
A notice of appeal starts the appeals process in New York. Trump’s lawyers will have an opportunity to expand on their grievances in subsequent court filings.
The Manhattan district attorney’s office, which prosecuted the case, will have a chance to respond in court papers. A message seeking comment was left with the office Wednesday.
Trump hired a new legal team from the firm Sullivan & Cromwell LLP to handle the appeal, spearheaded by the firm’s co-chair Robert J. Giuffra Jr.
Giuffra and four other lawyers from his firm stepped in after the president tabbed his two main defense lawyers, Todd Blanche and Emil Bove, for top positions in his administration’s Justice Department.
“President Donald J. Trump’s appeal is important for the rule of law, New York’s reputation as a global business, financial and legal center, as well as for the presidency and all public officials,” Giuffra said in a statement provided by a Trump spokesperson.


Norwegian mass murderer Breivik loses prison condition case

Norwegian mass murderer Breivik loses prison condition case
Updated 30 January 2025
Follow

Norwegian mass murderer Breivik loses prison condition case

Norwegian mass murderer Breivik loses prison condition case
  • “The Court of Appeal considers that the restrictions are sufficiently justified,” the three judges said in their ruling
  • They also said that the prison authorities have put in place sufficient measures to compensate for his relative isolation in prison

OSLO: A Norwegian court on Wednesday rejected an appeal brought by right-wing extremist and mass killer Anders Behring Breivik, who claims his prison conditions are a violation of human rights.
Breivik, who killed 77 people in July 2011, has regularly complained about his prison conditions, despite them including three private cells, two Guinea pigs, a flat-screen television and a video game console.
Claiming that he has been “treated like an animal,” Breivik has sued the Norwegian state on several occasions in a bid to get improvements to compensate for his relative isolation.
He has argued that this isolation constitutes a violation of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), which prohibits “inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment.”
His case was struck down by a district court in February, after which he appealed.
“The Court of Appeal considers that the restrictions are sufficiently justified by the risk of violence that persists,” the three judges said in their ruling Wednesday.
They also said that the prison authorities have put in place sufficient measures to compensate for his relative isolation in prison.
The court also dismissed Breivik’s appeal for an easing of the filtering of his mail, for which he also invoked the ECHR on the right to correspondence.
On July 22, 2011, Breivik set off a bomb near government offices in Oslo, killing eight people, before gunning down 69 others, mostly teens, at a Labour Party youth wing summer camp on the island of Utoya.
He said he had killed his victims because they embraced multiculturalism.
He was sentenced in 2012 to 21 years in prison, which can be extended as long as he is considered a threat.