Senegal results show large win for opponent Faye in presidential poll

Senegal results show large win for opponent Faye in presidential poll
Senegal's president-elect Bassirou Diomaye Faye speaks during a press conference in Dakar on March 25, 2024. (REUTERS/ Luc Gnago)
Short Url
Updated 28 March 2024
Follow

Senegal results show large win for opponent Faye in presidential poll

Senegal results show large win for opponent Faye in presidential poll
  • Once his victory is validated by Senegal’s top constitutional body, Faye becomes the youngest president in nation's history
  • Faye, who was only freed from prison 10 days before the election, said he wants a “break” with the current political system

DAKAR: Anti-establishment figure Bassirou Diomaye Faye has comfortably won the Senegalese presidential election with 54.28 percent of votes in the first round, official provisional results showed Wednesday.

He placed well ahead of the governing coalition’s candidate, former prime minister Amadou Ba, who garnered 35.79 percent.
The victory for Faye, who was only freed from prison 10 days before the election, still has to be validated by Senegal’s top constitutional body, which could happen in a few days.
Faye, 44, who has said he wants a “break” with the current political system, is set to become the youngest president in Senegal’s history.
It would be the first time since independence from France in 1960 that an opponent has won in the first round.
Aliou Mamadou Dia, who came third out of 19 candidates officially on the list, won just 2.8 percent of the vote, according to figures read out at the Dakar court by the president of the national vote counting commission, Amady Diouf.
While his victory in Sunday’s vote was already clear after the publication of unofficial partial results, the margin of Faye’s win was confirmed by the vote counting commission, which falls under the judiciary.
The turnout of 61.3 percent was less than in 2019 when outgoing President Macky Sall won a second term in the first round, but more than in 2012.
The announcement of the official provisional results seems to clear the way for a handover of power between Sall and his successor.
The political crisis triggered by Sall’s last-minute postponement of the vote, and the subsequently rushed electoral timetable, cast doubt on whether the handover could take place before the incumbent’s term officially ends on April 2.
But a swift handover now seems feasible in the West African nation, which prides itself on its stability and democratic principles in a coup-hit region, provided no appeals are made.
Presidential candidates have 72 hours after the results are announced by the commission to appeal to the Constitutional Council.
The Constitution states that if no appeals are made in this period, “the Council shall immediately proclaim the final results of the ballot.”
But if an objection is made, the Council has five days to rule and could, in theory, annul the election.

Faye, who has never held elected office, is set to become the fifth president of the West African country of around 18 million people.
His fellow presidential candidates, and Sall, have recognized his victory.
Sunday’s election was preceded by three years of tension and deadly unrest, with Senegal plunged into a fresh political crisis in February when Sall decided to delay the presidential poll.
Dozens have been killed and hundreds arrested since 2021, with the country’s democratic credentials coming under scrutiny.
Faye himself was detained for months before his release in the middle of the election campaign.
International observers hailed the smooth running of Sunday’s vote.
The African Union’s observation mission commended the “political and democratic maturity of the Senegalese people (and) the generally peaceful political atmosphere of the presidential election.”
US President Joe Biden on Wednesday congratulated Faye and “the Senegalese people, who have demonstrated that the right to vote — and have that vote counted — remains democracy’s threshold liberty.”
Faye has promised to restore national “sovereignty” and implement a program of “left-wing pan-Africanism.”
His election could herald a profound overhaul of Senegal’s institutions.
On Monday, he pledged “to govern with humility, with transparency, and to fight corruption at all levels.”
He said he would prioritize “national reconciliation,” “rebuilding institutions” and “significantly reducing the cost of living.”
But he also sought to reassure foreign partners.
Senegal “will remain a friendly country and a sure and reliable ally for any partner that engages with us in virtuous, respectful and mutually productive cooperation,” he pledged.


Zelensky hails ‘positive movement’ in relations with US

Zelensky hails ‘positive movement’ in relations with US
Updated 55 min 57 sec ago
Follow

Zelensky hails ‘positive movement’ in relations with US

Zelensky hails ‘positive movement’ in relations with US
  • “Today our Ukrainian and US teams began working on a meeting,” Zelensky said
  • “There is positive movement. We hope for the first results next week“

KYIV: Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said on Wednesday there had been “positive movement” in cooperation with the United States that could lead to another meeting between the two sides soon.
Kyiv is eager to repair ties with its top military supporter against Russia’s invasion after Zelensky publicly clashed with US President Donald Trump in the White House last week over how to end the war in Ukraine.
“Today our Ukrainian and US teams began working on a meeting. Andriy Yermak and Mike Waltz spoke,” Zelensky said in his evening address, referring to his chief of staff and the US national security adviser.
“There is positive movement. We hope for the first results next week.”

Yermak said on X he had “exchanged views on security issues and the alignment of positions” with Waltz, and that they had scheduled a meeting of Ukrainian and US officials “in the near future to continue this important work.”
Both statements came just hours after CIA Director John Ratcliffe said the US had
paused intelligence-sharing with Ukraine.


Non-consensual possession of images of Muslim women without hijabs could become offense in UK

Non-consensual possession of images of Muslim women without hijabs could become offense in UK
Updated 54 min 26 sec ago
Follow

Non-consensual possession of images of Muslim women without hijabs could become offense in UK

Non-consensual possession of images of Muslim women without hijabs could become offense in UK
  • MPs recommend that having ‘non-consensual intimate images’ should be a criminal act amid plans to also outlaw their creation
  • New report says cultural, religious sensitivities should be taken into account when deciding what constitutes ‘intimate’

LONDON: MPs in the UK have proposed making it a criminal offense to possess images of Muslim women not wearing hijabs without their consent.

The suggestion was made in a report by the House of Commons’ women and equalities committee, which said such photos should constitute “non-consensual intimate images.”

The MPs said under current legal definitions, such images include people being partially or fully nude, or engaging in behavior such as sexual activity or using the bathroom. 

The report said: “Abuse can also include material that is considered ‘culturally intimate’ for the victim, such as a Muslim woman being pictured without her hijab.”

It added: “Non-consensual intimate image abuse is not always limited to sexually explicit content. For example, in some cultures, countries, or religions, sharing a photograph of someone without their religious clothing — or with their arm around another person — can be disastrous for the victim.”

Creating intimate images without consent, “in circumstances in which an ordinary reasonable person would reasonably expect to be afforded privacy,” is set to be made a criminal offense later this year, but possession will remain legal.

The report concluded that the government “should bring forward amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill to make possession of non-consensual intimate images an offence.”

In November, Parliamentary Undersecretary of State for Victims Alex Davies-Jones told the committee that the Law Commission had decided it would be “impossible to craft a definition that suits everyone.”

The committee’s chair, Sarah Owen, said: “Non-consensual intimate image abuse is a deeply personal crime which can have life-changing and life-threatening consequences.

“We welcome the Government’s proposals to make creating non-consensual intimate images an offence, but a legal gap remains.

“The Government should bring forward amendments to the Crime and Policing Bill to make possession as well as the creation … an offence.

“This ensures non-consensual intimate images receives the same legal treatment as child sexual abuse material.”


Romania expels two military officials attached to Russian embassy for breaching diplomatic rules

Romania expels two military officials attached to Russian embassy for breaching diplomatic rules
Updated 05 March 2025
Follow

Romania expels two military officials attached to Russian embassy for breaching diplomatic rules

Romania expels two military officials attached to Russian embassy for breaching diplomatic rules
  • Romania’s Foreign Minister Emil Hurezeanu informed the head of the Russian embassy of the decision during a meeting on Wednesday, the ministry said
  • The Russian embassy described the decision as “unfounded and unfriendly”

BUCHAREST: Romania said on Wednesday it had expelled two military diplomats from the Russian embassy in Bucharest as tensions sour between Moscow and the European Union and NATO-member country.
Romania’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs said the decision related to Russia’s military, air and naval attaché, Victor Makovskiy, and his deputy, Evgeni Ignatiev, over alleged “activities that contravene the provisions of the Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations of 1961.” The ministry did not provide further detail.
Romania’s Foreign Minister Emil Hurezeanu informed the head of the Russian embassy of the decision during a meeting on Wednesday, the ministry said.
The Russian embassy described the decision as “unfounded and unfriendly.” The embassy “reserves the right to take retaliatory measures,” it said in a Facebook post.
The expulsions came a day Russia’s SVR foreign intelligence service reportedly claimed European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had asked Bucharest to bar Romanian presidential candidate Calin Georgescu, who emerged as the frontrunner in last year’s canceled election, from participating in the rerun in May.
Georgescu has praised Russian President Vladimir Putin in the past as “a man who loves his country” and called Ukraine “an invented state,” but he claims not to be pro-Russian.
Romania’s Constitutional Court made the unprecedented move to annul the election two days before the Dec. 8 runoff after Georgescu’s surprise first-round win. The far-right populist had polled in single digits and declared zero campaign spending, after which allegations of electoral violations and Russian interference emerged. Moscow has denied it interfering in the Romanian election process.
Election rerun
Romanian prosecutors have launched a criminal investigation against Georgescu, accusing him of supporting fascist groups, “incitement to actions against the constitutional order,” and false declarations regarding electoral campaign financing and asset disclosures. Prosecutors placed him under judicial control, which he has appealed.
Georgescu, who has repeatedly denied any wrongdoing, said on Monday outside a court in Bucharest that it is “a political case” against him.
The first round of the rerun of the election is scheduled for May 4. If no candidate gets more than 50 percent of ballots, a runoff will follow on May 18.
It isn’t yet clear whether Georgescu will be able to participate in the new election.


Vance visits the US-Mexico border to tout Trump’s immigration crackdown

Vance visits the US-Mexico border to tout Trump’s immigration crackdown
Updated 05 March 2025
Follow

Vance visits the US-Mexico border to tout Trump’s immigration crackdown

Vance visits the US-Mexico border to tout Trump’s immigration crackdown
  • Vance will be joined in Eagle Pass, Texas, by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard
  • The White House says Vance is set to tour the border, hold a roundtable with local, state, and federal officials and visit a detention facility

TEXAS: Vice President JD Vance is visiting the US-Mexico border on Wednesday to highlight the tougher immigration policies that the White House says has led to dramatically fewer arrests for illegal crossings since Donald Trump began his second term.
Vance will be joined in Eagle Pass, Texas, by Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard as the highest-ranking members of Trump’s Republican administration to visit the southern border.
The White House says Vance is set to tour the border, hold a roundtable with local, state, and federal officials and visit a detention facility. State authorities and local activists say Vance’s itinerary also likely includes a visit to Shelby Park, a municipal greenspace along the Rio Grande that Republican Gov. Greg Abbott seized from federal authorities last year in a feud with the Biden administration. Abbott accused that administration of not doing enough to curb illegal crossings.
“Border security is national security,” Hegseth told Fox News before the trip. He added, “We’re sending those folks home, and we’re not letting more in. And you’re seeing that right now.”
Trump made a crackdown on immigration a centerpiece of his reelection campaign, pledging to halt the tide of migrants entering the US and stop the flow of fentanyl crossing the border. As part of that effort, he imposed 25 percent tariffs on imports from Mexico and Canada, saying neither is doing enough to address drug trafficking and illegal immigration.
“They are now strongly embedded in our country. But we are getting them out and getting them out fast,” Trump said of migrants living in the US illegally as he delivered an address to a joint session of Congress on Tuesday night.
Although Trump has not made a trip to the border since Inauguration Day, the visit of three of his top officials is evidence of the scope of his administration’s focus on the issue. He has tasked agencies across the federal government with working to overhaul border and immigration policy, moving well beyond the Department of Homeland Security, the traditional home of most such functions.
Arrests for illegal border crossings from Mexico plummeted 39 percent in January from a month earlier, though they’ve been falling sharply since well before Trump took office on Jan. 20 from an all-time high of 250,000 in December 2023. Since then, Mexican authorities increased enforcement within their own borders and President Joe Biden, a Democrat, introduced severe asylum restrictions early last summer.
The Trump administration has showcased its new initiatives, including putting shackled immigrants on US military planes for deportation fights and sending some to the US lockup at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba. It has also expanded federal agents’ arrests of people in the US illegally and abandoned programs that gave some permission to stay.
Trump border czar Tom Homan said migrants with criminal records have been prioritized in early efforts to round up and deport people in the US illegally, but he added of other migrants, “If you’re in the county illegally, you’re not off the table.”
“When we find the bad guy, many times they’re with others, others who aren’t a criminal priority, but were in the country illegally,” Homan told reporters outside the White House on Tuesday. “They’re coming, too.”
Since Trump’s second term began, about 6,500 new active duty forces have been ordered to deploy to the southern border. Before that, there were about 2,500 troops already there, largely National Guard troops on active duty orders, along with a couple of hundred active duty aviation forces.
Of those being mobilized, many are still only preparing to go. Last weekend, Hegseth approved orders to send a large portion of an Army Stryker brigade and a general support aviation battalion to the border. Totaling about 3,000 troops, they are expected to deploy in the coming weeks.
Troops are responsible for detection and monitoring along the border but don’t interact with migrants attempting to illegally cross. Instead, they alert border agents, who then take the migrants into custody.
Biden tasked Vice President Kamala Harris with tackling the root causes of immigration during his administration, seeking to zero in on why so many migrants, particularly from Central America, were leaving their homelands and coming to the US seeking asylum or trying to make it into the county illegally.
Harris made her first visit to the border in June 2021, about 3 1/2 months deeper into Biden’s term than Vance’s trip in the opening weeks of Trump’s second term. Trump has routinely joked that Harris was in charge of immigration policy but didn’t visit the border or even maintain close phone contact with federal officials.
Vance’s trip also comes as the Trump administration is considering the use of the Alien Enemy Act of 1798 to detain and deport Venezuelans based on a proclamation labeling the gang Tren de Aragua an invasion force that could be acting at the behest of that country’s government. That’s according to a US official with knowledge of the matter who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal administration deliberations.
It is unclear how close the decisions are to being finalized. Some officials have questioned whether the gang is acting as a tool for Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, whom the US has not recognized as that country’s legitimate leader. There are some concerns that invoking the law would require the US to more formally recognize Maduro.
Still, the 1798 law allows the president to deport any noncitizen from a country with which the US is at war, and it has been mentioned by Trump as a possible tool to speed up his mass deportations.


Trump says US to ‘wage war’ on Mexican drug cartels

Trump says US to ‘wage war’ on Mexican drug cartels
Updated 05 March 2025
Follow

Trump says US to ‘wage war’ on Mexican drug cartels

Trump says US to ‘wage war’ on Mexican drug cartels
  • Donald Trump: ‘The cartels are waging war on America, and it’s time for America to wage war on the cartels, which we are doing’
  • Warning came hours after Trump slapped 25 percent tariffs on Mexico and Canada, citing a lack of progress in stemming the flow of drugs such as fentanyl into the US

WASHINGTON: US President Donald Trump vowed Tuesday to “wage war” on Mexico’s drug cartels, which he accused of rape and murder as well as “posing a grave threat” to national security.
“The cartels are waging war on America, and it’s time for America to wage war on the cartels, which we are doing,” he told Congress in his first address since returning to power.
The warning came hours after Trump slapped 25 percent tariffs on Mexico and Canada, citing a lack of progress in stemming the flow of drugs such as fentanyl into the United States.
Cracking down on gang members and undocumented immigrants is a key priority for the Trump administration, which designated several Latin American cartels as foreign terrorist organizations last month.
“The territory to the immediate south of our border is now dominated entirely by criminal cartels that murder, rape, torture and exercise total control,” Trump told the joint session of Congress.
“They have total control over a whole nation, posing a grave threat to our national security.”
Faced with mounting pressure from Trump, Mexico extradited 29 alleged drug traffickers to the United States last week.
The White House had earlier accused the Mexican government of having an “intolerable alliance” with drug trafficking groups, which President Claudia Sheinbaum rejected as “slander.”
“They want to make us happy. First time ever,” Trump said, referring to the extraditions.
“But we need Mexico and Canada to do much more than they’ve done, and they have to stop the fentanyl and drugs pouring into the USA.”
Sheinbaum warned the United States last month that Mexico would never tolerate an “invasion” of its national sovereignty in the fight against drugs.
“They can call them (the cartels) whatever they want, but with Mexico, it is collaboration and coordination, never subordination or interventionism, and even less invasion,” she said.
“We do not negotiate sovereignty,” added Sheinbaum, who last month announced the deployment of 10,000 more troops to the US-Mexico border, where cartels operate.